Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better?

Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):

Share this content! On (X network) By

Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better? Publisher

Alikhassi A¹

Show Affiliations

1. Department of Radiology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

Source: Archives of Breast Cancer Published:2019

Abstract

[No abstract available]

Related Docs

1. Evaluation of Suspicious Appearing Microcalcification Groups on Mammogram: Comparing Bi-Rads 5Th Edition Descriptors With the Bi-Rads 4Th Edition and Pathologic Association, Iranian Journal of Radiology (2018)

Experts (# of related papers)

Nasrin Ahmadinejad (1)

Maryam Rahmani (1)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Alikhassi A. "Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better?." Archives of Breast Cancer, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, pp. 51-54.
APA	Alikhassi A (2019). Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better?. Archives of Breast Cancer, 6(2), 51-54.
Chicago	Alikhassi A. "Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better?." Archives of Breast Cancer 6, no. 2 (2019): 51-54.
Harvard	Alikhassi A (2019) 'Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better?', Archives of Breast Cancer, 6(2), pp. 51-54.
Vancouver	Alikhassi A. Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better?. Archives of Breast Cancer. 2019;6(2):51-54.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Alikhassi A}, title = {Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better?}, journal = {Archives of Breast Cancer}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {51-54}, year = {2019} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Alikhassi A TI - Comparing Bi-Rads 2013 With the 2003 Edition: Has It Worked Better? JO - Archives of Breast Cancer VL - 6 IS - 2 SP - 51 EP - 54 PY - 2019 ER -