The Effect of Urinary Diversion on Kidney Function in Posterior Urethral Valves and Ureterovesical Obstruction Publisher Pubmed



Arshadi H¹ ; Oskouie IM² ; Ghozatloo M¹ ; Zolbin MM¹ ; Amirzargar H¹ ; Ghahestani SM¹ ; Kajbafzadeh AM¹ ; Hekmati P¹ Show Affiliations
Source: International Urology and Nephrology Published:2025

Abstract

Introduction: Posterior urethral valves (PUV) and ureterovesical junction obstruction (UVJO) are common etiologies of lower urinary tract obstruction. The primary objective of therapy is to alleviate the obstruction in the urinary system. Temporary urinary diversion may be necessary in certain situations, such as Urinary tract infection (UTI), sepsis, and unchanging hydronephrosis. This study, aims to assess kidney parameters after urinary diversion (either pyelostomy or ureterostomy) in patients with PUV and UVJO. Method: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with PUV or UVJO and treated with urinary diversion following urinary undiversion at our facility between 2015 and 2020. The following variables were collected: demographic details, surgical interventions (type of diversion), serum creatinine throughout follow-up, anterior–posterior diameter of the pelvis (APP), anterior–posterior diameter of the ureter (APU), and sonographic findings of renal parenchymal thickness (PT) as documented by a pediatric radiologist. Additionally, before and after urinary diversion, a Dimercapto succinic acid (DMSA) nuclear renal scan was conducted to assess renal function. Result: We analyzed 67 patients, with a mean follow-up of 38.3 months, undergoing either ureterostomy (42 patients) or pyelostomy (25 patients). This included 38 patients with PUV and 29 with UVJO. In PUV patients, significant improvements were observed in APP (MD = 5.56 ± 11.6, p = 0.0194), APU (MD = 5.57 ± 7.28, p < 0.001), and PT (MD = 3.66 ± 2.75, p < 0.001). Similarly, UVJO patients experienced significant improvements in APP (MD = 12.18 ± 18.63, p = 0.005), APU (MD = 7.82 ± 8.98, p = 0.001), and PT (MD = 2.79 ± 3.33, p = 0.001). DMSA scores did not significantly change in either group (p > 0.05). Notably, APP improved more in UVJO patients compared to PUV patients (p = 0.047). Conclusion: Our study suggests that urinary diversion could improve APP, APU, and renal parenchymal thickness in PUV and UVJO patients. The improvement of APP in UVJO patients was greater than in the PUV group. We propose further multi-center studies with longer durations of follow-up and more detailed additional data to support and confirm our results. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024.