Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Drainage-Related Ultrasonography (Drus): A Novel Technique for Discriminating Obstructive and Nonobstructive Hydroureters in Children Publisher



Kajbafzadeh AM1 ; Mehdizadeh M2 ; Aryan Z1 ; Ebadi M1 ; Esfahani SA3 ; Montaserkouhsari L1 ; Elmi A4 ; Talab SS4 ; Sadeghi Z5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Pediatric Urology Research Center, Pediatric Center of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 32, 2nd Floor, 7th Street Saadat-Abad Ave, Tehran, 1998714616, Iran
  2. 2. Pediatric Radiology Department, Pediatric Center of Excellence, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
  4. 4. Division of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, 02114, MA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Urology, University Hospitals of Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, 44106, OH, United States

Source: Journal of Ultrasound Published:2015


Abstract

Background: Despite advances in urologic imaging, the paucity of an optimal technique that accurately clarifies obstructive and nonobstructive hydroureter exists.Objective: This study was conducted to introduce a novel and modified ultrasonographic technique, known as drainage-related ultrasonography (DRUS), discriminating obstructive and nonobstructive, nonrefluxing hydroureter.Materials and methods: A total of 358 children (mean age, 3.7 years) with 418 nonrefluxing hydroureter were included. These children were composed of two groups of obstructive nonrefluxing (141 children with 157 dilated ureters) and nonobstructive, nonrefluxing (217 children with 261 hydroureter). The definite diagnosis regarding the subtype of hydroureter was derived from appropriate investigation. The maximum diameter of the dilated ureter, which was observed on ultrasonography, was recorded before and after 3 h of catheterization, as D1 and D2, respectively. To assess the D ratio, a formula was developed, that is, [(|D1 − D2|)/D1] × 100. Values were recorded and cutoff points were set to discriminate between subtypes.Results: Obstructive versus nonobstructive subtypes of nonrefluxing hydroureter were clarified with 78.5 % sensitivity and 83.4 % specificity, by setting a cutoff point of 22 % for the D ratio. Regardless of the cutoff point assigned to the reduction in D (D2 compared with D1), DRUS revealed 93.9 % sensitivity, 80.6 % specificity, 63.2 % positive predictive value, and 97.4 % negative predictive value in discriminating upper from lower obstruction.Conclusion: DRUS affords favorable results in terms of differentiating between obstructive and nonobstructive, nonrefluxing hydroureter, as well as between upper and lower obstruction in obstructive cases. It has the potential to become an efficient imaging modality in the diagnostic algorithm of hydroureter. © 2014, Societa Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB).