Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Classification of Breast Cancer Risk Based on Clinical Data Publisher



Rafiepoor H1 ; Ghorbankhanloo A1 ; Zendehdel K1 ; Madar ZZ2, 3 ; Hajivalizadeh S4 ; Hasani Z5 ; Sarmadi A6 ; Amanpourgharaei B1 ; Barati MA7 ; Saadat M8 ; Sadeghzadeh SA9 ; Amanpour S1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Cancer Biology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Osteoporosis Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  9. 9. Department of Computing, School of Digital, Technologies and Arts, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom

Source: Cancer Reports Published:2025


Abstract

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is a major global health concern with rising incidence and mortality rates in many developing countries. Effective BC risk assessment models are crucial for prevention and early detection. While the Gail model, a traditional logistic regression-based model, has been broadly used, its predictive performance may be limited by its linear assumptions. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical sciences, various complex machine learning algorithms have been developed for risk prediction, including for BC. Aims: This study aims to compare the quality of AI-based models with the traditional Gail model in assessing BC risk using a population dataset. It also evaluates the performance of these models in predicting BC risk. Methods and Results: This study involved 942 newly diagnosed BC patients and 975 healthy controls at the Cancer Institute in IKH hospital Complex, Tehran. Ten classification algorithms were applied to the dataset. The accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and feature importance in the machine learning algorithms were assessed and compared to previous studies for evaluation. The study found that AI algorithms alone did not significantly improve predictability compared to the Gail model. However, the importance of variables varied significantly among the AI algorithms. Understanding feature importance and interactions is crucial in AI modeling in order to enhance accuracy and identify critical risk factors. Conclusion: This study concluded that, in BC risk prediction, incorporating specific risk factors, such as genetic and image-related variables, may be necessary to further enhance accuracy in BC risk prediction models. Furthermore, it is crucial to address modeling issues in models with a restricted number of features for future research. © 2025 The Author(s). Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Other Related Docs
15. Direct and Indirect Medical Costs of Bladder Cancer in Iran, Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (2023)
16. A Decision Support System for Mammography Reports Interpretation, Health Information Science and Systems (2020)
24. The Epidemiology of Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (2023)
35. Assessing Breast Cancer Risk Among Iranian Women Using the Gail Model, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (2016)
37. Principles of Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacogenetics, Precision Medicine in Clinical Practice (2022)
39. Prediction of Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning Approaches, Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering (2022)