Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Esophageal Injury, Perforation, and Fistula Formation Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Publisher Pubmed



Shehadeh M1 ; Wan EY2 ; Biviano A2 ; Mollazadeh R3 ; Garan H2 ; Yarmohammadi H2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Heart Institute, Columbia University, Miami, FL, United States
  2. 2. Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
  3. 3. Department of Cardiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Published:2024


Abstract

Background: Esophageal perforation and fistula formation are rare but serious complications following atrial fibrillation ablation. In this review article, we outline the incidence, pathophysiology, predictors, and preventative strategies of this dreaded complication. Methods: We conducted an electronic search in 10 databases/electronic search engines to access relevant publications. All articles reporting complications following atrial fibrillation ablation, including esophageal injury and fistula formation, were included for systematic review. Results: A total of 130 manuscripts were identified for the final review process. The overall incidence of esophageal injury following atrial fibrillation ablation was significantly higher with thermal ablation modalities (radiofrequency 5–40%, cryoballoon 3–25%, high-intensity focused ultrasound < 10%) as opposed to non-thermal ablation modalities (no cases reported to date). The incidence of esophageal perforation and fistula formation with the use of thermal ablation modalities is estimated to occur in less than 0.25% of all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. The use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring probe and mechanical esophageal deviation showed protective effect toward reducing the incidence of this complication. The prognosis is very poor for patients who develop atrioesophageal fistula, and the condition is rapidly fatal without surgical intervention. Conclusions: Esophageal perforation and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation are rare complications with poor prognosis. Various strategies have been proposed to protect the esophagus and reduce the incidence of this fearful complication. Pulsed field ablation is a promising new ablation technology that may be the future answer toward reducing the incidence of esophageal complications. Graphical Abstract: The recognition of risk factors and preventative strategies of esophageal injury, perforation, and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation is essential to reduce the incidence of this dreaded complication (online abstract figure). (Figure presented.) © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023.