Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Radiation-Induced Non-Targeted Effect and Carcinogenesis; Implications in Clinical Radiotherapy Publisher



Yahyapour R1 ; Salajegheh A2 ; Safari A3 ; Amini P4 ; Rezaeyan A5 ; Amraee A5 ; Najafi M6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Medicine, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiology, School of Paramedical, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Kermanshah University of Medical Science, Kermanshah, Iran

Source: Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering Published:2018


Abstract

Bystander or non-targeted effect is known to be an interesting phenomenon in radio-biology. The genetic consequences of bystander effect on non-irradiated cells have shown that this phenomenon can be considered as one of the most important factors involved in secondary cancer after exposure to ionizing radiation. Every year, millions of people around the world undergo radiotherapy in order to cure different types of cancers. The most crucial aim of radiotherapy is to improve treatment efficiency by reducing early and late effects of exposure to clinical doses of radiation. Secondary cancer induction resulted from exposure to high doses of radiation during treatment can reduce the effectiveness of this modality for cancer treatment. The perception of carcinogenesis risk of bystander effects and factors involved in this phenomenon might help reduce secondary cancer incidence years after radiotherapy. Different mo-dalities such as radiation LET, dose and dose rate, fractionation, types of tissue, gender of patients, etc. may be involved in carcinogenesis risk of bystander effects. Therefore, selecting an appropriate treatment modality may improve cost-effectiveness of radiation therapy as well as the quality of life in survived patients. In this review, we first focus on the carcinogenesis evidence of non-targeted effects in radiotherapy and then review physical and biological factors that may influence the risk of secondary cancer induced by this phenomenon. © 2018, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
10. Radiation-Induced Inflammation and Autoimmune Diseases, Military Medical Research (2018)
12. Metformin Protects the Rat Small Intestine Against Radiation Enteritis, Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products (2019)
33. Targets for Protection and Mitigation of Radiation Injury, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2020)
35. Regulation of Cell Death Mechanisms by Melatonin: Implications in Cancer Therapy, Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry (2022)
37. The Inhibitory Effect of Melatonin on the Proliferation of Irradiated A549 Cell Line, Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics (2020)
44. Metformin: Prevention of Genomic Instability and Cancer: A Review, Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (2018)
46. Melatonin Ameliorates Radiation-Induced Sciatic Nerve Injury, Letters in Drug Design and Discovery (2020)