Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review”

Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review” Publisher Pubmed

Shirzad M¹ ; Abbassian A¹

Show Affiliations

1. Department of Traditional Medicine, School of Persian Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Human Resources for Health Published:2022

Abstract

Systematic reviews cling to the doctrine that science has an updating databank and attempt to identify all available evidence by featured eligibility criteria to find the answer to a unique scientific question. Therefore, to reach this aim, these researches should use a wise method and comprehensive search strategy, as they are widely used to guide clinical and political decisions and the establishment of future researches. We would like to appreciate Jenny Care, Amie Steel, and Jon Wardle for the valuable article “Stakeholder attitudes to the regulation of traditional and complementary medicine professions: a systematic review”. Some important missed search terms in the field of traditional medicine names and traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) regulation concepts were discussed in the article. © 2022, The Author(s).

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Shirzad M, Abbassian A. "Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review”." Human Resources for Health, vol. 20, no. 1, 2022, pp. -.
APA	Shirzad M, Abbassian A (2022). Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review”. Human Resources for Health, 20(1), -.
Chicago	Shirzad M, Abbassian A. "Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review”." Human Resources for Health 20, no. 1 (2022): -.
Harvard	Shirzad M, Abbassian A (2022) 'Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review”', Human Resources for Health, 20(1), pp. -.
Vancouver	Shirzad M, Abbassian A. Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review”. Human Resources for Health. 2022;20(1):-.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Shirzad M and Abbassian A}, title = {Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review”}, journal = {Human Resources for Health}, volume = {20}, number = {1}, pages = {-}, year = {2022} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Shirzad M AU - Abbassian A TI - Methodological Issues on “Stakeholder Attitudes to the Regulation of Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professions: A Systematic Review” JO - Human Resources for Health VL - 20 IS - 1 SP - EP - PY - 2022 ER -

Science Communicator Platform

Authors

Authors Affiliations

Abstract