Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Investigation of a Hybrid Kinematic Calibration Method for the 'Sina' Surgical Robot Publisher



Alamdar A1, 2 ; Samandi P1 ; Hanifeh S1 ; Kheradmand P1 ; Mirbagheri A1, 3 ; Farahmand F1, 4 ; Sarkar S1, 3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute (AMTEI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1419733131, Iran
  2. 2. Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, 21218, MD, United States
  3. 3. Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran
  4. 4. Mechanical Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, 1458889694, Iran

Source: IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters Published:2020


Abstract

Calibrating the inverse kinematics of complex robots is often a challenging task. Finding analytical solutions is not always possible and the convergence of numerical methods is not guaranteed. The model-free approaches, based on machine learning and artificial intelligence, are fast and easy to work, however, they need a huge amount of experimental training data to provide acceptable results. In this article, we proposed a hybrid method to benefit the advantage of both model-based and model-free approaches. The forward kinematics of the robot is calibrated using a model-based approach, and its inverse kinematics using a neural network. Hence, while there is no need to solve the nonlinear inverse kinematic equations, the training data of the neural network is generated artificially by the calibrated forward kinematic model. The implementation of the proposed methodology on slave robot of the 'Sina' surgical system revealed reasonably good results. The accuracy improved by {\bf 53\%} and {\bf 43\%} for position and orientation, respectively, after calibration. © 2016 IEEE.