Effect of Laser-Assisted and Conventional In-Office Bleaching on Monomer Release From Microhybrid and Nanohybrid Composite Publisher



Omrani LR¹ ; Pedram P² ; Sadray S³ ; Hashemi Kamangar SS¹ ; Chiniforoush N⁴ Show Affiliations
Source: Laser Therapy Published:2017

Abstract

Background and aims: Bleaching might affect structural properties of composite materials, and lead to monomer release. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of Laser-assisted and conventional in-office bleaching on the release of BIS-GMA, TEGDMA, and UDMA monomers from a nanohybrid and a microhybrid BIS-GMA based composite. Materials and Methods: 32 samples of each composite, were divided into 4 subgroups; subgroup 1: Conventional in-office bleaching (CIB) with the Opalescence Boost PF 38% gel, subgroup 2: Laser-assisted bleaching (LBO) with the Opalescence Boost PF 38% gel, subgroup 3: Laser-assisted bleaching (LBH) with the JW Power bleaching gel, subgroup 4: (CO) control without bleaching. All the samples were immersed in tubes of 2cc Ethanol 75% medium. The released monomers were analyzed using the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method 24 h, 7, and 28 days. Data’s were analyzed by Univariate Analysis of Variance test followed by Tukeys HSD. Results: The amount of TEGDMA monomer released was not significant. However, nanohybrid composites showed significantly more monomer release than microhybrid composites (P < 0.05). For UDMA the interaction was significant only after 1 week. In microhybrid composites, the CO subgroup showed more monomer release than LBH and LBO. In nanohybrid composites, LBH showed more monomer release than CIB and CO subgroups. For BIS-GMA monomers the interaction was significant at all time periods and the LBH subgroup of nanohybrid composite had significantly more BIS_GMA release in comparison to other subgroups. Conclusion: Bleaching by laser with JW Power Bleaching gel led to more monomer release in nanohybrid composite. © 2017 JMLL, Tokyo, Japan.