Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Energy and Cost Analysis of Bottom Waste Cooking Oil (B-Wco) Based Solid Alcohol Biofuel and Supernatant Waste Cooking Oil (S-Wco) Based Biodiesel Publisher



Nabizadeh R1, 2 ; Garcia IL3 ; Bahmani Z2 ; Norouzian Baghani A1, 4 ; Sadjadi S5 ; Yaghmaeian K1, 2 ; Kamarehie B4 ; Mahvi AH1, 2 ; Yunesian M2, 6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Center for Solid Waste Research, Institute for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Physical Chemistry and Applied Thermodynamics, Edf. Leonardo da Vinci, Campus de Rabanales, Universidad de Cordoba, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario, ceiA3, Spain
  4. 4. Environmental health research center, Lorestan university of medical sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
  5. 5. Radiation Application Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Research Methodology and Data Analysis, Institute for Environmental Research (IER), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Heliyon Published:2025


Abstract

Waste cooking oil (WCO) represents one of the most available renewable energy sources to produce solid alcohol biofuel (SABF) and biodiesel. The objective of this work is to conduct energy and cost balances for biodiesel and SABF generation from supernatant waste cooking oil (S-WCO) and bottom waste cooking oil (B-WCO) derived from catering facilities in Iran, respectively. The total energy input/output for SABF and biodiesel, respectively, were 31.738/37.180 MJ/L and 34.269/42.163 MJ/L, with the majority of the energy contribution being B-WCO/S-WCO (78.77/73.57 %), followed by machinery (19.76/18.30 %), and ethanol/methanol (0.69/7.47 %), in both cases. Renewable energy and non-renewable energy inputs for SABF and biodiesel were calculated as 25.071 MJ/L/6.667 MJ/L and 25.280 MJ/L/8.990 MJ/L of total energy input, respectively. Total cost and revenues for SABF vs. biodiesel production processes were 1.318 vs. 1.342 $/L and 5.620 vs. 2.481$/L, respectively. Gross return, net return and benefit to cost ratio values for SABF vs. biodiesel were 1.449 vs. 1.548 $/L, 1.060 vs. 1.157 $/L, and 1.827 vs. 1.876, respectively. Hence, considering the energy balances of the valorization process for WCO, the population growth in cities, and the need for inexpensive and plentiful sources of renewable energy, the production of SABF and biodiesel may offer a valuable solution in developing countries. © 2025 The Authors