Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Role of Aortic Compliance in Determination of Coarctation Severity: Lumped Parameter Modeling, in Vitro Study and Clinical Evaluation Publisher Pubmed



Keshavarzmotamed Z1, 2, 3 ; Edelman ER1, 2, 4 ; Motamed PK5, 6 ; Garcia J3, 7 ; Dahdah N8 ; Kadem L3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
  2. 2. Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
  3. 3. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  4. 4. Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, United States
  5. 5. Giulan Medical University, Rasht, Guilan, Iran
  6. 6. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
  8. 8. Division of Cardiology, Sainte-Justine Hospital, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada

Source: Journal of Biomechanics Published:2015


Abstract

Early detection and accurate estimation of the extent of coarctation of the aorta (COA) is critical to long-term outcome. Peak-to-peak trans-coarctation pressure gradient (PKdP) higher than 20mmHg is an indication for interventional/surgical repair. Patients with COA have reduced proximal and distal aortic compliances. A comprehensive study investigating the effects of variations of proximal COA and systemic compliances on PKdP, and consequently on the COA severity evaluation has never been done. This study evaluates the effect of aortic compliance on diagnostic accuracy of PKdP. Lumped parameter modeling and in vitro experiments were performed for COA severities of 50%, 75% and 90% by area. Modeling and in vitro results were validated against retrospective clinical data of PKdP, measured in 54 patients with COA. Modeling and in vitro. PKdP increases with reduced proximal COA compliance (+36%, +38% and +53% for COA severities of 50%, 75% and 90%, respectively; p<0.05), but decreases with reduced systemic compliance (-62%, -41% and -36% for COA severities of 50%, 75% and 90%, respectively; p<0.01). Clinical study. PKdP has a modest correlation with COA severity (R=0.29). The main determinants of PKdP are COA severity, stroke volume index and systemic compliance. Systemic compliance was found to be as influential as COA severity in PKdP determination (R=0.30 vs. R =0.34). In conclusion, PKdP is highly influenced by both stroke volume index and arterial compliance. Low values of PKdP cannot be used to exclude the severe COA presence since COA severity may be masked by reduced systemic compliance and/or low flow conditions. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
Related Docs