Prediction of Intraperitoneal Adhesions in Repeated Cesarean Sections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Shafti V¹ ; Azarboo A² ; Ghaemi M² ; Gargari OK³ ; Madineh E² Show Affiliations
Source: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Published:2023

Abstract

Objective: With the rate of repeated cesarean sections on the rise, intraperitoneal adhesions caused by repeated cesareans could give rise to maternal morbidity during delivery. As a result, it's critical to have the ability to predict adhesions. The current meta-analysis aims to determine if intraperitoneal adhesions are likely to be present based on the characteristics of the cesarean scar, striae gravidarum, and sliding sign. Materials and methods: We systematically searched electronic databases before retrieving articles up until October 13th, 2022 for analysis. After data extraction and literature screening, we first performed a quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 score system. Following that, a bivariate random-effect meta-analysis model was used to obtain the combined diagnostic and predictive values. To pinpoint the origins of heterogeneity, we conducted a subgroup analysis. Fagan's Nomogram was used to validate the clinical utility. Sensitivity analysis was used to gauge the reliability of each included study, and Egger's test and funnel plot asymmetry was used to investigate publication bias. Results: 25 studies totaling 1840 patients with intra-abdominal adhesions and 2501 controls without adhesions were included in the systematic review. Diagnostic values from 8 studies regarding skin characteristics were combined, and the results for depressed scar showed: sensitivity[95 %CI] = 0.38[0.34–0.42]; Specificity[95 %CI] = 0.88[0.85–0.90]; DOR[95 %CI] = 4.78[2.50–9.13]; AUC = 0.65. Negative sliding sign from 7 studies, although not showing a diagnostic difference between cases and controls, had excellent predictive values: sensitivity[95 %CI] = 0.71[0.65–0.77]; Specificity[95 %CI] = 0.87[0.85–0.89]; DOR[95 %CI] = 6.88[0.6–78.9]; AUC = 0.77. Subgroup analysis illustrated non-Turkish studies to reveal more significant associations than Turkish studies. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis found that the occurrence of adhesions can be predicted by the characteristics of abdominal wounds, particularly depressed scar, and scar width, as well as a negative sliding sign following a previous cesarean section. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.