Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Clinical Significance of Cell-Free Dna As a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Publisher



Eskandari M1 ; Manoochehrabadi S2 ; Pashaiefar H3, 4 ; Zaimy MA5 ; Ahmadvand M3, 4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Genetics, Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Cell Therapy and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Hematologic Malignancies Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran

Source: Blood Research Published:2019


Abstract

Background Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has the potential to serve as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker in some types of neoplasia. The investigation of plasma concentration of cfDNA may reveal its use as a valuable biomarker for risk stratification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The present prognostic value of plasma cfDNA has not been widely confirmed in DLBCL subjects. Here, we evaluated cfDNA plasma concentration and assessed its potential prognostic value as an early DLBCL diagnostic tool. Methods cfDNA concentrations in plasma samples from 40 patients with DLBCL during diagnosis and of 38 normal controls were determined with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the multi-locus L1PA2 gene. Results Statistically significant elevation in plasma cfDNA concentrations was observed in patients with DLBCL as compared to that in normal controls (P<0.05). A cutoff point of 2.071 ng/mL provided 82.5% sensitivity and 62.8% specificity and allowed successful discrimination of patients with DLBCL from normal controls (area under the curve=0.777; P=0.00003). Furthermore, patients with DLBCL showing higher concentrations of cfDNA had shorter overall survival (median, 9 mo; P=0.022) than those with lower cfDNA levels. In addition, elevated cfDNA concentration was significantly associated with age, B-symptoms, International Prognostic Index (IPI) score, and different stages of disease (all P<0.05). Conclusion Quantification of cfDNA with qPCR at the time of diagnosis may allow identification of patients with high cfDNA concentration, which correlates with aggressive clinical outcomes and adverse prognosis. © 2019 Korean Society of Hematology.
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)