Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluation Results of National Hospital Accreditation Program in Iran: The View of Hospital Managers; [Resultados De La Evaluacion Del Programa Nacional De Acreditacion Hospitalaria En Iran: Opinion De Los Directores De Hospitales] Publisher Pubmed



Yousefinezhadi T1 ; Mosadeghrad AM2 ; Hinchcliff R3 ; Akbarisari A2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Source: Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Published:2020


Abstract

Background: Accreditation programs have a crucial role in improving the safety and effectiveness of hospital services. Many factors contribute to achieve accreditation goals. This study evaluated the national Iranian hospital accreditation program from the view of hospital managers in Iran. Methods: The study was conducted in 2015 using a validated questionnaire designed to collect feedback concerning accreditation processes and impacts. In total, 547 managers were surveyed using a stratified random sampling method. A 5-degree scale Likert from totally disagree = 1 to totally agree = 5 has been used for the evaluation. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: Approximately half of hospital managers were satisfied with the accreditation standards and surveying methods. The reason for their dissatisfaction was the high number of measures (2.38). The main challenges to the accreditation method were reported inadequate surveyor training (2.94) their satisfaction with the infrastructure was low because of a lack of hospital resources. Nonetheless, the accreditation program was perceived as being successful in improving patient safety (3.80), patient compliance (3.72), and error reduction (3.53). Conclusion: An effective accreditation program requires reducing the number of standards and making them clearer as well as the infrastructure for the implementation of accreditation such as sufficient and sustainable funds, enough human resources and equipment should be provided. Appropriate surveyors should be selected and trained professionally to ensure inter-rater reliability among them. © 2019 FECA
1. Evaluation of Hospital Accreditation Method, Tehran University Medical Journal (2017)
2. Evaluation of Accreditation Effects in Hospitals, Tehran University Medical Journal (2019)
3. An Analysis of Hospital Accreditation Policy in Iran, Iranian Journal of Public Health (2017)
4. Evaluation of Hospital Accreditation in Tehran: Brief Report, Tehran University Medical Journal (2018)
7. Developing a Hospital Accreditation Model: A Delphi Study, BMC Health Services Research (2021)
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
9. Iran Hospital Accreditation Standards: Challenges and Solutions, International Journal of Health Planning and Management (2021)
10. Hospital Accreditation: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, International Journal of Healthcare Management (2021)
11. An Accreditation Model for Children Friendly Hospitals: Brief Report, Tehran University Medical Journal (2019)
15. Hospital Infection Control Accreditation Standards: A Comparative Review, Journal of Health and Safety at Work (2022)
20. Comments on “Iran Hospital Accreditation System”, Iranian Journal of Public Health (2016)