Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Misoprostol Versus Oxytocin on Delivery Outcomes After Labour Induction in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Publisher Pubmed



Ameri A1, 3 ; Jafariazar Z1, 4 ; Anabi M1, 3 ; Davari Dolatabadi M2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Pharmacoeconomic and Pharmaceutical Management, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Source: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Published:2024


Abstract

A large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published on the effects of oral/vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin on delivery outcomes; however, data from these RCTs are conflicting. Although some meta-analyses summarized available findings in this regard, several eligible RCTs have been published since the release of those meta-analyses. Therefore, the current updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs was conducted to compare the effects of oral/vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin on delivery and neonatal outcomes. A systematic search, using relevant keywords, was done in the online databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science, up to April 2023, to identify eligible articles investigating the effect of oral/vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin on delivery outcomes including maternal [cesarean/vaginal delivery within 24 h after labour induction, Tachysystole, hypertonicity, hyper-stimulation, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)] and neonatal outcomes [mean Apgar score, admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and death]. In total, 45 RCTs with a total sample size of 8406 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed that vaginal misoprostol administration, compared with oxytocin, resulted in a significant reduction in the rate of cesarean and a significant increase in the rate of vaginal delivery and Tachysystole risk. Also, oral misoprostol was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of cesarean and a significant increase in the risk of hypertonicity compared with oxytocin. However, oral misoprostol had no significant effect on vaginal delivery compared with oxytocin. For other outcomes including hyper-stimulation, perinatal death, NICU admission, and mean Apgar score among newborns, we found no significant difference between oral/vaginal misoprostol and oxytocin. In total, vaginal/oral misoprostol might be a better method for labour induction compared with oxytocin. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023412325. © 2023 Elsevier B.V.