Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research?

Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research? Publisher Pubmed

Nielsen RO¹ ; Debeskristensen K¹ ; Hulme A^{2, 3} ; Bertelsen ML¹ ; Moller M¹ ; Parner ET⁴ ; Mansournia MA^{5, 6}

Show Affiliations

1. Section for Sports Science, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
2. Australian Collaboration for Research into Injury in Sports and Its Prevention (ACRISP), Federation University Australia, VIC, Australia
3. Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia
4. Section for Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6. Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: British Journal of Sports Medicine Published:2019

Abstract

[No abstract available]

Related Docs

1. Time-To-Event Analysis for Sports Injury Research Part 1: Time-Varying Exposures, British Journal of Sports Medicine (2019)

2. Time-To-Event Analysis for Sports Injury Research Part 2: Time-Varying Outcomes, British Journal of Sports Medicine (2019)

Experts (# of related papers)

Mohammad Ali Mansournia (2)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Nielsen RO, et al.. "Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research?." British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 53, no. 7, 2019, pp. 396-397.
APA	Nielsen RO, Debeskristensen K, Hulme A, Bertelsen ML, Moller M, Parner ET, Mansournia MA (2019). Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research?. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(7), 396-397.
Chicago	Nielsen RO, Debeskristensen K, Hulme A, Bertelsen ML, Moller M, Parner ET, Mansournia MA. "Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research?." British Journal of Sports Medicine 53, no. 7 (2019): 396-397.
Harvard	Nielsen RO et al. (2019) 'Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research?', British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(7), pp. 396-397.
Vancouver	Nielsen RO, Debeskristensen K, Hulme A, Bertelsen ML, Moller M, Parner ET, et al.. Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research?. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019;53(7):396-397.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Nielsen RO and Debeskristensen K and Hulme A and Bertelsen ML and Moller M and Parner ET and Mansournia MA}, title = {Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research?}, journal = {British Journal of Sports Medicine}, volume = {53}, number = {7}, pages = {396-397}, year = {2019} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Nielsen RO AU - Debeskristensen K AU - Hulme A AU - Bertelsen ML AU - Moller M AU - Parner ET AU - Mansournia MA TI - Are Prevalence Measures Better Than Incidence Measures in Sports Injury Research? JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine VL - 53 IS - 7 SP - 396 EP - 397 PY - 2019 ER -

Science Communicator Platform

Authors

Authors Affiliations

Abstract