Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Body Fat and Risk of All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies Publisher Pubmed



Jayedi A1, 2 ; Khan TA3, 4 ; Aune D5, 6, 7, 8 ; Emadi A9 ; Shabbidar S2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Science and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Toronto 3D Knowledge Synthesis & Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
  4. 4. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  5. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  6. 6. Department of Nutrition, Bjorknes University College, Oslo, Norway
  7. 7. Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  8. 8. Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  9. 9. Food Safety Research Center (salt), Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

Source: International Journal of Obesity Published:2022


Abstract

Background/objectives: We aimed to evaluate the relationships between body fat percentage (BF%), fat mass (FM), fat mass index (FMI) and visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) with risk of all-cause mortality. Methods: We did a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to June 2021. We selected prospective cohorts of the relationship between body fat with risk of all-cause mortality in the general population. We applied random-effects models to calculate the relative risks (RRs) and 95%CIs. Results: A total of 35 prospective cohort studies with 923,295 participants and 68,389 deaths were identified. The HRs of all-cause mortality for a 10% increment in BF were 1.11 (95%CI: 1.02, 1.20; I2 = 93%, n = 11) in the general adult populations, and 0.92 (95%CI: 0.79, 1.06; I2 = 76%, n = 7) in adults older than 60 years. The HRs were 1.06 (95%CI: 1.01, 1.12; I2 = 86%, n = 10) for a 5 kg increment in FM, 1.11 (95%CI: 1.06, 1.16; I2 = 79%, n = 7) for a 2 kg/m2 increment in FMI, and 1.17 (95%CI: 1.03, 1.33; I2 = 72%, n = 8) and 0.81 (0.66, 0.99; I2 = 59%, n = 6) for a 1-SD increment in VAT and SAT, respectively. There was a J shaped association between BF% and FM and all-cause mortality risk, with the lowest risk at BF% of 25% and FM of 20 kg. In subgroup analyses, although there was little evidence of between-subgroup heterogeneity, the observed positive associations were more pronounced in studies which had a longer duration, excluded participants with prevalent cardiovascular disease and cancer at baseline, with adjustment for smoking or restricted to never smokers, and less pronounced in studies which adjusted for potential intermediates, suggesting an impact of reverse causation, confounding and over-adjustment in some of the studies. Conclusions: Higher body fat content was related to a higher risk of mortality in a J shaped manner. Any future studies should further assess the impact of reverse causation and residual confounding on these associations. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42021240743). © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
36. Prevalence of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia in Iran, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2016)