Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
White Noise’S Effect on Premature Infants’ Physiological Parameters During Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Publisher Pubmed



Rahimi O1 ; Roshan FS2 ; Nikrouz L3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Neonatal Intensive Care Nursing, Bahrami Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Midwifery and Nursing, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Faculty of Nursing, Yasouj University of Medical Sciences, Kohkiloyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Yasuj, Iran

Source: BMC Pediatrics Published:2025


Abstract

Background: Early and continuous exposure to painful stimuli in premature infants leads to short-and long-term complications. Listening to white noise is an accessible and inexpensive non-invasive method that can be used as a safe nursing intervention in hospitals. This study aimed to assess white noise’s effect on premature Infants’ physiological parameters during peripheral intravenous catheter insertion. Methods: The present experimental study was conducted on 40 premature Infants. From 5 min before Indwelling catheters to 10 min after, white noise was played through headphones to infants at a controlled volume in the test group. Using a monitor, physiological parameters were recorded from 10 min before to 30 min after the Indwelling catheter. Statistical analysis was done through the SPSS version 27 software program. Results: Regarding respiratory rate, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the first, second, and sixth stages (p < 0.05). However, in the third, fourth, and fifth stages, RR in the control group was significantly higher than the test group (p ≤ 0.05). In terms of mean arterial blood pressure, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in any of the stages (p < 0.05). In terms of heart rate, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the first, second, and sixth stages (p < 0.05). However, in the third, fourth, and fifth stages, HR in the control group was significantly higher than the test group (p ≤ 0.05). Regarding oxygen saturation percentage, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the first, second, third, and sixth stages (p < 0.05). In contrast, in the fourth and fifth stages, the oxygen saturation percentage in the test group was significantly higher than in the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although in both groups the painful procedure led to an increase in physiological variables (respiratory rate, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure) and a decrease in blood oxygen saturation, in the test group these variables approached their initial state more quickly within half an hour after exposure to white noise. This confirms that the effect of white noise on the improvement of physiological variables is gradual. Clinical trial number: Not applicable. © The Author(s) 2025.
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)