Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! By
Does a Given Abbreviated Injury Scale Value in Different Body Regions Contribute to the Same Risks of In-Hospital Mortality and Icu Admission in Trauma Patients? Publisher



Khavandegar A1 ; Yazdi SAM2 ; Salamati P1 ; Zafarghandi M1 ; Rahimimovaghar V1 ; Fakharian E3 ; Saeedbanadaky SH4 ; Hoseinpour V5 ; Sadeghian F6 ; Isfahani MN7, 8 ; Rahmanian V9 ; Ghadiphasha A10 ; Pourmasjedi S11 ; Aali R11 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Khavandegar A1
  2. Yazdi SAM2
  3. Salamati P1
  4. Zafarghandi M1
  5. Rahimimovaghar V1
  6. Fakharian E3
  7. Saeedbanadaky SH4
  8. Hoseinpour V5
  9. Sadeghian F6
  10. Isfahani MN7, 8
  11. Rahmanian V9
  12. Ghadiphasha A10
  13. Pourmasjedi S11
  14. Aali R11
  15. Kogani M12
  16. Sadeghibazargani H13
  17. Rad RF14
  18. Piri SM1
  19. Mirzamohamadi S1
  20. Tabatabaei MSHZ1
  21. Naghdi K1
  22. Baigi V1, 15

Source: Frontiers in Emergency Medicine Published:2024


Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that identical abbreviated injury scale (AIS) scores may lead to varying risks of in-hospital mortality and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) depending on the specific body region affected. Methods: This study focused on hospitalized trauma patients with moderate to serious injuries (AIS=2, 3). The final sample was stratified based on the injured body regions. To determine the impact of these injuries on mortality and ICU admission, we conducted binary logistic regression after adjusting for confounding factors. Results: Overall, 16,040 trauma patients with moderate injury (AIS=2) and 1,338 trauma patients with serious injury (AIS=3) were included in this study. When comparing outcomes of trauma patients in different body regions, there was no significant difference in the odds of two main outcomes in various injury sites, except for extremities (P values>0.05). When the AIS=2 patients were controlled for confounding factors, the adjusted odds of mortality were significantly higher for head, face, and neck injuries, as well as spine/back, thoracic, and abdominal injuries, compared to extremity injuries (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)s=9.81, 8.78, 8.11, and 3.96, respectively; P-values<0.05). Among those with AIS=3, the odds of mortality were significantly greater for abdominal (aOR=7.05, P-value=0.009) and head, face, and neck injuries (aOR=2.73, P-value=0.001) than for extremity injuries. Conclusion: Injuries with the same AIS (=2, 3) value almost indistinguishably confer the same mortality risk and ICU admission, except for extremities. The unique AIS value assigned to various body sites almost consistently indicates the same likelihood of negative outcomes. © 2024 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Other Related Docs