Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Zirconia and Titanium Abutments With Different Diameters Publisher Pubmed



Shabanpour R¹ ; Mousavi N² ; Ghodsi S³ ; Alikhasi M³ Show Affiliations
Source: Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice Published:2015

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of the current study was to compare the fracture resistance and mode of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with different diameters. Materials and methods: Fourteen groups of abutments including prefabricated zirconia, copy-milled zirconia and titanium abutments of an implant system (XiVE, Dentsply) were prepared in different diameters. An increasing vertical load was applied to each specimen until failure occurred. Fracture resistance was measured in each group using the universal testing machine. Moreover, the failure modes were studied and categorized as abutment screw fracture, connection area fracture, abutment body fracture, abutment body distortion, screw distortion and connection area distortion. Groups were statistically compared using univariate and post-hoc tests. The level of statistical significance was set at 5%. Results: Fabrication method (p = 0.03) and diameter (p<0.001) had significant effect on the fracture resistance of abutments. Fracture resistance of abutments with 5.5 mm diameter was higher than other diameters (p<0.001). The observed modes of failure were dependent on the abutment material as well. All of the prefabricated titanium abutments fractured within the abutment screw. Abutment screw distortion, connection area fracture, and abutment body fracture were the common failure type in other groups. Conclusion: Diameter had a significant effect on fracture resistance of implant abutments, as abutments with greater diameters were more resistant to static loads. Copy-milled abutments showed lower fracture resistance as compared to other experimental groups. Clinical significance: Although zirconia abutments have received great popularity among clinicians and even patients selecting them for narrow implants should be with caution. © 2015