Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Physical Activity Equivalent Labeling Vs. Calorie Labeling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Seyedhamzeh S1, 2, 7 ; Bagheri M3 ; Keshtkar AA4 ; Qorbani M5 ; Viera AJ6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Food and Nutrition Policy, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Stud. Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Health Sciences Education Development, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
  7. 7. No 44, Hojjat-dost Alley, Tehran, 1416-643931, Iran

Source: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Published:2018


Abstract

Background: Many countries are trying to identify strategies to control obesity. Nutrition labeling is a policy that could lead to healthy food choices by providing information to consumers. Calorie labeling, for example, could lead to consumers choosing lower calorie foods. However, its effectiveness has been limited. Recently, physical activity equivalent labeling (i.e., displaying calories in terms of estimated amount of physical activity to burn calories) has been proposed as an alternative to the calorie-only label. The aim of this review was to identify and evaluate the published literature comparing effects on health behavior between physical activity equivalent labeling and calorie-only labeling. Method: We searched the following databases: Pubmed/medline, Scopus, Web of science, Agris, Cochrane library, Google Scholar. We also searched along with reference lists of included articles. Articles that were published between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2016 were eligible for inclusion provided they reported on studies that examined the effects of both types of labeling and included at least one outcome of interest. Mean and standard deviations of the included results were combined using a fixed-effect model. The difference in calories purchased between people exposed to physical activity labeling and calorie-only labeling was calculated as weighted mean difference by using a fixed-effect model. Result: The difference of calories ordered between physical activity label and calorie label groups was not statistically significant (SMD: -0.03; 95% CI: -0.13, 0.07). The difference of calories ordered between physical activity label and calorie label according to real vs unreal (e.g. web-based) condition was 65 Kcal fewer in real-world settings. Conclusion: Physical activity calorie equivalent labeling in minutes does not significantly reduce calories ordered compared to calorie-only labeling. © 2018 The Author(s).
Other Related Docs
13. Effect of Stevia on Blood Glucose and Hba1c: A Meta-Analysis, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (2024)
22. Water Intake and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies, Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews (2021)
37. Sleep Quality in Iranian Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2019)
46. Prediction of Intraperitoneal Adhesions in Repeated Cesarean Sections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2023)