Comparison of Misoprostol With Foley Catheter Vs Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor in Patients With Premature Rupture of Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study Publisher



Poorhosseini SA¹ ; Mirteimouri M¹ ; Rakhshanifar M¹ ; Mousavi Vahed SH¹ ; Haghollahi F²
Source: Advanced Biomedical Research Published:2024

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the effect of misoprostol alone in comparison with misoprostol with Foley catheter in preparing the cervix for induction of labor in women with premature rupture of the amniotic sac. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial study was performed from 2017 to 2019 on 206 pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and gestational age more than 36 weeks, whose rupture of the amniotic sac had occurred less than 12 hours and had a Bishop score less than 4. These women were randomly assigned to two groups of Foley catheters with misoprostol (intervention group, P = 103) or misoprostol alone (control group, P = 103) to induce labor. In both groups, sublingual misoprostol (25 micrograms) was administered at intervals of 4–6 hours. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS.21 software. Results: There is no significant difference between age and Bishop score in the two groups (P = 0.19, P = 0.31, respectively). Lower doses (0 to 3) of misoprostol were used in the intervention group versus 0 to 5 doses in the control group (P = 0.001). Delivery time was shorter in the intervention group (10.83 hours vs. 13.10 hours in the control group, P = 0.001). Also, the probability of complications such as fever, tachysystole, and hospitalization of an infant in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) did not increase. Conclusion: An intracervical Foley catheter with misoprostol is more effective in inducing labor in pregnancies with premature rupture of the membranes than using misoprostol alone and can be a safe and effective option. © 2024 Advanced Biomedical Research | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.