Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Clinicoradiological Outcomes and Complication Profiles of Bilateral Dual Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screws Versus Bilateral Single Sacral-Alar-Iliac Screws in Patients With Spinal Deformity Who Underwent Grade 3 or 4 Spinal Osteotomies: A Retrospective Comparative Study Publisher Pubmed



Kankam SB1, 5 ; Zarei M2, 3 ; Moghadam N4 ; Jouibari MF1 ; Bazzazi AM2 ; Yaseen Khan FM2 ; Moosavi M2 ; Shafizadeh M1 ; Roohollahi F2 ; Makki BE1 ; Khadivi M1, 2 ; Rostami M1, 2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Spine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Harvard Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States

Source: World Neurosurgery Published:2023


Abstract

Objective: To compare short-term clinical and radiological outcomes and complication profiles between bilateral dual sacral-2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and bilateral single S2AI screw fixation techniques in patients who underwent grade 3 or 4 osteotomy. Methods: A retrospective review of 83 patients treated with bilateral dual S2AI screws and 32 patients treated with bilateral single S2AI screws was conducted between 2018 and 2020 with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Clinical and radiological outcomes of patients and incidence of perioperative complications, including rod breakage, screw dislodgment, proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, need for reoperation, and systemic adverse effects, were collected and statistically compared between the groups. Results: With a mean follow-up of 18.2 months, rod fracture (6.0% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.03), screw dislodgment (0 vs. 12.5%, P < 0.01), and S2AI screw loosening (1.2% vs. 18.7%, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in the dual S2AI screws group than in the single S2AI screws group. However, the reoperation rate was similar between the 2 groups (24.1% vs. 34.3%, P = 0.26). No significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes as well as proximal junctional kyphosis (10.8% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.25) and proximal junctional failure (9.6% vs. 18.7%, P = 0.18) were identified between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The dual S2AI screw fixation technique showed more advantages over the single S2AI screw fixation technique with reduced incidence of screw dislodgment, rod fractures, and sacral-alar-iliac screw loosening. © 2023 Elsevier Inc.