Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Role of Routine Plain Film Imaging Post Cochlear Implantation Publisher Pubmed



Kouhi A1, 2 ; Sharifi A1, 2 ; Blevins NH3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, United States

Source: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States) Published:2025


Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of routine post-op X-ray in cochlear implantation patients. Study Design: Retrospective chart review study. Setting: Primary or revision cochlear implant patients who had routine postoperative X-ray (XR) or had planned postoperative computed tomography (CT) due to clinical concerns for array malposition. Methods: All images were reviewed, and those were considered abnormal if there was a bent tip, kinking, incomplete insertion, or if the electrode array didn't follow the expected cochlear curvature. Postoperative CT scans were performed in patients with abnormal postoperation X-ray, or if there were abnormal surgical findings encountered during insertion which raised the suspicion for suboptimal placement. Results: A total of 195 patients with a mean age of 64.8 ± 18.9 years were included. XRs were performed in 188 patients and others had CT scan from the beginning. Only 2 out of 188 patients had abnormal findings on XR, which showed malposition of the electrode in one patient and a tip fold over and incomplete insertion in the other one. Both patients with abnormal findings had labyrinthitis ossificans. The patient with tip fold over ultimately underwent re-implantation. Another patient with incomplete insertion had required extended basal turn drilling during implantation, and no additional measures were taken. Conclusion: Routine XR findings did not provide the reason for additional intervention, and its benefit for patients without demonstrable cochlear abnormalities was minimal. Post-op XR can be informative in selected high risk patients, but CT imaging is a reasonable alternative to better define anatomic array location in patients particularly at risk. © 2025 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.