Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Potassium Hydroxide 5% Solution With 5-Fluorouracil Cream in Patients With Actinic Keratoses: A Randomized Controlled Trial Publisher Pubmed



Salehi Farid A1 ; Niknam S2 ; Gholami K3 ; Tavakolpour S1, 4 ; Teimourpour A5 ; Daneshpazhooh M1 ; Nili A1 ; Azizpour A1 ; Nasimi M1 ; Mahmoudi H1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Research Center for Rational Use of Drugs, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical school, Boston, MA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Dermatological Treatment Published:2022


Abstract

Background: Actinic keratosis (AK) is a pre-cancerous skin lesion, associated with development of squamous cell carcinoma. Current treatment options are limited. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of topical 5-fluorouracil cream (5-FU) and potassium hydroxide 5% (KOH) in the treatment of AK. Methods: Eighteen patients with AK applied KOH solution or 5-FU on each side of their scalp/face, randomly. The efficacy and safety of these treatments were compared. Results: Thirteen (118 lesions) and ten (83 lesions) patients were successfully followed for one and three months, respectively. After one month, KOH showed a better clinical response (81% vs. 58%; p-value = 0.007) and dermoscopic response (KOH, 65% vs. 5-FU, 46%; p-value = 0.04); while no differences were noted after three months (clinical response, 83% vs.70%, p-value = 0.1; dermoscopic response, 76% vs. 59%, p-value = 0.1). No significant differences in the recurrence rate of the lesion between the two groups were noted at the end of the third month (p-value = 0.5). Regarding the safety of the treatments, the risk of developing erythema, scaling, sand swelling was higher in 5-FU group (p-value < 0.0001, for all), while more patients in KOH group had erosion and ulcer (p-value < 0.001 for both). KOH was up to 96% less expensive than 5-FU. Limitations: Low number of patients and short-term follow-up limited the analysis. Conclusion: KOH solution offers a faster and less expensive resolution of AK lesions than does 5-FU. Clinical Trial Code (IRCT.ir): IRCT20180909040978N1. © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.