Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Methods and Criteria for the Assessment of Orphan Drugs: A Scoping Review Publisher Pubmed



Mohammadshahi M1 ; Olyaeemanesh A2 ; Ehsanichimeh E3 ; Mobinizadeh M3 ; Fakoorfard Z1 ; Akbari Sari A4 ; Aghighi M5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Health Economics, National Institute for Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Health Policy, National Institute for Health Research and Health Equity Research Center (HERC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Health Services Management, National Institute for Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Health Policy, Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Head of Special Diseases Office, Vice Chancellery for Treatment, Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Published:2022


Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to identify different criteria for priority setting of rare diseases to help policy makers in making evidence-informed decisions. Methods A scoping review was conducted to comprehensively examine the existing various methods and criteria for prioritizing orphan drugs and rare diseases. We performed searching in Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and websites of health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, 2000-21, and data were extracted. Results From the 1,580 identified publications, eleven articles were included. Multicriteria decision analysis was the most frequent method (seven out of eleven studies) used for priority setting. The extracted criteria for priority setting of orphan products were analyzed based on six main categories as follows: health outcomes and clinical implications (six subsets which showed clinical implications), economic aspects (four subsets that indicated the economic effects of orphan drugs and rare diseases), disease and population characteristics (six subsets that included the characteristics of the rare diseases), therapeutic alternatives and uniqueness of orphan technologies (two subsets which discussed the alternatives and uniqueness of orphan technologies), evidence (three subsets which regarded the quality and availability of evidence), and other criteria (three subsets dealing with social and organizational criteria). Cost-effectiveness, budget impact, and disease severity were the most frequent criteria in the studies. Conclusions Because of the high price of orphan drugs and limitations of using HTA for reimbursement of them, it is critical to explore them by precise technical methods like multiple criteria decision making in priority setting. © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.