Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Validity and Reliability of the Evidence Utilisation in Policymaking Measurement Tool (Eupmt) Publisher Pubmed



Imaninasab MH1, 2 ; Yazdizadeh B3 ; Salehi M4 ; Seyedin H5 ; Majdzadeh R3, 6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Khorramabad, Iran
  2. 2. Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Department of Public Health, School of Health and Nutrition, Khorramabad, Iran
  3. 3. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Iran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran, Iran

Source: Health Research Policy and Systems Published:2017


Abstract

Background: As a well-known theory in studying the effective factors on behaviour, the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) is frequently used in evaluating the health behaviour of people and healthcare providers, but rarely applied in studying the behaviour of health policymakers. The aim of the present study is to design and validate a TPB-based measurement tool for evidence utilisation in health policymaking (the EUPMT) through a mixed approach using confirmatory factor analysis. Methods: The study population consisted of all the specialised units and their employees in the five deputies of Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education in 2013. All those eligible were invited to participate in the study, which comprised 373 persons. The reliability of the EUPMT was determined through test-retest and internal consistency. Additionally, its validity was determined by face, content, convergent, discriminant and construct validities. SPSS-20 and LISREL-8.8 were employed to analyse the data. To assess the fitness of the measurement models, three groups of indices were used, i.e. absolute, relative and parsimonious. Results: The content and face validities of the tool were 83% and 67%, respectively. Cronbach's alpha of different constructs ranged from 0.7 to 0.9. In the test-retest method, the intra-class correlations were between 0.75 and 0.87. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the penta-factorial structure of the experimental data had acceptable fitness with the TPB (GFI = 0.86, NFI = 0.94, RSMEA = 0.075). Conclusion: TPB is able to explain the behaviour of evidence utilisation in health policymaking. The finalised TPB-based tool has relatively good reliability and validity to assess evidence utilisation in health policymaking. The EUPMT can be applied to determine the status quo of evidence utilisation in health policymaking, whilst designing interventions for its improvement and assessing their outcomes. © 2017 The Author(s).
Other Related Docs
20. Cross-Culture Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Duke Health Profile, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (2021)
25. Interprofessional Teamwork Education: Moving Toward the Patient-Centered Approach, Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing (2016)
26. Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of the Research Misconduct Questionnaire (Prmq), Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine (2020)
43. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the “Quality of Life Scale” in Schizophrenia, Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (2018)