Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Impact of Rigid Cervical Collars on Outcome of Patients Who Underwent Posterior Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Comparative Study Publisher



Khadivi M1 ; Moghadam N2 ; Saghebdoust S2, 3 ; Khan FMY4 ; Eslamian M1 ; Jouibari MF1 ; Shafizadeh M1 ; Moosavi M4 ; Zarei M4, 5 ; Kordi R2, 4 ; Rostami M4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Razavi Hospital, Mashhad, Iran
  4. 4. Spine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Orthopaedics, Imam Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Asian Spine Journal Published:2023


Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the cervical collar impact on the functional outcomes of patients after posterior cervical laminectomy and lateral mass screw fixation (PCLF) surgery. Overview of Literature: The safety and possible benefits of implementing rigid cervical collars subsequent to PCLF are insufficiently investigated. Methods: Patients who underwent PCLF and received postoperative cervical collars from 2018 to 2020 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Their data were compared with an age and sex-matched group of subjects who did not receive collars after PCLF during the same period. Pain intensity (using the Visual Analog Scale), Neck Disability Index, and quality of life (using 36-item Short Form Health Survey) of the patients were compared at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: A total of 36 patients who received cervical collars after surgery and 40 controls were included. At baseline and 1-month follow-up, there were no differences in pain intensity, functional status, and quality of life between the groups. However, at 3 months postoperatively, the quality of life of the subjects with no orthosis was higher than those who received cervical collars (p =0.01). At 6 and 12-month follow-up, there were no differences between the groups in pain intensity, functional status, and quality of life. Conclusions: No difference in the pain intensity and functional status of patients who used cervical collars and controls was shown in our study. Patients who did not wear cervical collars had a higher quality of life during the 3-month postoperative evaluation. Future prospective, well-controlled studies with longer follow-ups are needed to further investigate the effects of cervical orthosis on the clinical outcome of patients after PCLF. © 2023 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.