Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Uterine Cavity Irrigation With Office Hysteroscopy During Ovarian Stimulation for Ivf: A Randomized Controlled Trial Publisher



Ghasemi M1 ; Aleyasin A2 ; Fatemi HM3, 6 ; Ghaemdoust F4 ; Shahrakipour M5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Pregnancy Health Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Infertility, Faculty of Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. In-Vitro-Fertilisation (IVF) Department, Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  4. 4. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
  6. 6. Clinical Laboratory, Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Source: Frontiers in Endocrinology Published:2022


Abstract

Objective: This was a non-blinded randomized controlled study to evaluate whether endometrial irrigation via office hysteroscopy during the early follicular phase would lead to a higher level of live birth rates compared to no irrigation in the fresh embryo transfer cycle. Method: The study was conducted in Tehran university of medical sciences from June 2015 to June 2016. women under the age of 40 with primary infertility without history of previous IVF/ICSI or hysteroscopic examination, were included. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was done. Hysteroscopy was performed in the early mid-follicular phase of a stimulation cycle (day 5-7) with a vaginoscopy approach and saline irrigation in hysteroscopy group. Embryo-transfer was done in the same cycle. Results: 228 patients completed their participation in the study. In the fresh cycle, clinical pregnancy rate was 46% in the hysteroscopy group and 40.43% in the control group. (p-value= 0.326, RR= 1.16 [95%CI: 0.862 to 1.56]). Live birth rate was 41.28% in the hysteroscopic group and 31.93% in the control group (p-value=0.143, RR= 1.293 [95%CI: 0.916 to 1.825]). For those patients having surplus cryopreserved embryos, after 2 months, a second embryo transfer was performed. The cumulative LBR was 44.05% in the hysteroscopic group and 32.25% in the control group (p-value=0.029, RR= 1.368 [95%CI: 1.031 to 1.815], RD= 11.9% [95%CI: 1.2% to 22.3%] and NNT= 8 [95%CI: 4 to 85]). Conclusion: The current study clearly demonstrated a significantly higher cumulative live birth rate in the intervention group. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.irct.ir/trial/19586], identifier IRCT2016011022795N2. Copyright © 2022 Ghasemi, Aleyasin, Fatemi, Ghaemdoust and Shahrakipour.
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)