Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Sirolimus 0.2% Cream As Adjuvant Therapy With Pulsed Dye Laser for the Treatment of Port Wine Stain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Publisher Pubmed



Fallahi M1, 2 ; Hallaji Z1 ; Tavakolpour S1, 3 ; Niknam S4 ; Salehi Farid A1 ; Nili A1 ; Teimourpour A5 ; Daneshpazhooh M1 ; Rahmati J6 ; Haddady Abianeh S6 ; Mahmoudi H1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
  3. 3. Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  4. 4. Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital and Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Port Wine Stain (PWS) is a congenital capillary malformation. Although multiple treatments are required, the gold standard treatment for PWS is Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL). Given its anti-angiogenic effects, sirolimus can be considered as an adjuvant to PDL in PWS. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical sirolimus (Rapamycin) 0.2% cream as adjuvant therapy for PDL for PWS. Methods: In this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 15 patients with PWS were enrolled. Each lesion was divided into upper and lower parts, and each part was assigned randomly to receive PDL (4 sessions, 2 months apart) plus sirolimus vs PDL and placebo. The response was evaluated using colorimetry, investigator global assessment (IGA), and patient global assessment (PGA) every two months for eight continuous months. Results: According to the colorimetric analysis, medial and lateral sides of the treatment and placebo parts did not differ significantly (both P-value >.05). However, according to PGA and IGA, there was a significant difference in favor of sirolimus (P-values =.041 and.039, respectively). Itching and dryness (86.7%), contact dermatitis (20%) were the most common adverse effects in the sirolimus group, while none of them were observed in placebo. Conclusion: Although the improvement was significant subjectively, topical sirolimus 0.2% as an adjuvant to PDL does not appear to improve PWS erythema using calorimetric assessment. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC