Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Ethical Prioritization of Patients During Disaster Triage: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence Publisher Pubmed



Ghanbari V1 ; Ardalan A1, 2 ; Zareiyan A3 ; Nejati A1, 4 ; Hanfling D5, 6 ; Bagheri A7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Health in Disaster and Emergencies Department, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
  3. 3. Health in Disaster and Emergencies Department, School of Nursing, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Center for Health Security, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, Baltimore, MD, United States
  6. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
  7. 7. Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16th Azar st, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Emergency Nursing Published:2019


Abstract

Introduction: Triage is a dynamic and complex decision-making process in order to determine priority of access to medical care in a disaster situation. The elements which should govern an ethical decision-making in prioritizing of victims have been debated for a long time. This paper aims to identify ethical principles guiding patient prioritization during disaster triage. Method: Electronic databases were searched via structured search strategy from 1990 until July 2017. The studies investigating patients’ prioritization in disaster situation were eligible for inclusion. All types of articles and guidelines were included. Result: Of 7167 titles identified in the search, 35 studies were included. The important factors identified in patient prioritization were grouped into two categories: medical measures (medical need, likelihood of benefit and survivability) and Nonmedical measures (saving the most lives, youngest first, preserving function of society, protecting vulnerable groups, required resources and unbiased selection). Demographic characteristics, health status of patients, social value of patient, and unbiased selection are discriminatory factors in disaster triage. Conclusion: Various factors have been introduced to consider ethical patient prioritization in disaster triage. Providers’ engagement, public education, and ongoing training are required to reach a fair decision. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd