Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Biodiversity Indices and Medically Importance of Ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran Publisher



Arzamani K1 ; Saghafipour A2 ; Ahmad Hashemi S1 ; Vatandoost H3 ; Alavinia M1, 4 ; Raeghi S5 ; Telmadarraiy Z3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Vector-borne Diseases Research Center, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Medical Entomology, Vector Control School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Toronto Rehabilitation Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
  5. 5. Department of Laboratory Sciences, Maragheh University of Medical Sciences, Maragheh, Iran

Source: Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Ticks are considered as the main vectors for the transmission of various pathogens such as relapsing fever and CCHF to humans. This study was investigated the biodiversity indices and medically importance of ticks in North Khorasan Province, Northeast of Iran during 2015-2019. Methods: Specimens were captured from infested ruminants including cows, sheep, and goats. Additionally, tick col-lections also were performed on non-domesticated creatures such as turtles, rodents, and hedgehogs. Specimens were identified using valid identification keys. Species diversity, species richness and evenness indices have been calculated to estimate species biodiversity of ticks. Results: A total of 1478 adult ticks were collected. The specimens were from two families: Ixodidae (90.05%) and Ar-gasidae (9.95%), 6 genera and 17 species including: Rhipicephalus sanguineus (55.9%), Rhipicephalus bursa (13.4%), Hyalomma marginatum (9.5%), Hyalomma anatolicum (9.5%), Hyalomma asiaticum (0.2%), Hyalomma aegyptium (0.5%), Hyalomma scupense (1.3%), Hyalomma sp (1.2%), Haemaphysalis sulcata (0.7%), Haemaphysalis erinacea (0.1%), Haemaphysalis inermis (0.1%), Haemaphysalis punctata (0.2%), Haemaphysalis concinna (0.1% Boophilus annulatus (1.2), and Dermacentor marginatus (6.1%) among hard ticks as well as Argas persicus (91.8%) and Argas reflexus (8.2%) amongst soft ticks. Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Rh. Bursa, Hy. marginatum and Hy. anatolicum were known as the most frequent species of hard ticks. Tick's species richness, Shannon diversity index and Simpson index in this area were S= 17, H'= 1.69, D= 0.294 respectively. Conclusion: Based on tick distribution veterinary authority, public health organizations and other officials should act for implementation of disease prevention. © 2021 The Authors.
Other Related Docs
12. Prevalence and Seasonal Activity of Ticks Infesting Livestock in North West Areas of Iran, Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences (2020)