Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Choroidal Thickness Changes in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Treated With Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Panretinal Photocoagulation With Intravitreal Bevacizumab Publisher Pubmed



Roohipoor R1, 2 ; Sharifian E1 ; Ghassemi F1 ; Riaziesfahani M1 ; Karkhaneh R1 ; Fard MA1 ; Zarei M1, 2 ; Modjtahedi BS2 ; Moghimi S1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin Square, Tehran, 1336616351, Iran
  2. 2. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, United States

Source: Retina Published:2016


Abstract

Purpose: To compare choroidal thickness (CT) and retinal thickness (RT) between eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or PRP with intravitreal bevacizumab (PRP + IVB). Methods: Thirty-three patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy were randomized to have one eye treated with PRP and the other with PRP + IVB. Change in CT was compared with baseline using enhanced depth imaging-optical coherence tomography at baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, and 10 after treatment. Change in RT was similarly assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Changes in both CT and RT were assessed in all nine macular areas as defined by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study subfields. Results: The PRP + IVB group had a significant decrease in subfoveal CT at 3 and 10 months (323.9 ± 62 m at baseline vs. 320.7 ± 64.8 m at Month 3 [P 0.024] and 304.7 ± 65.6 m at Month 10 [P 0.003]). Subfoveal CT significantly decreased at 10 months compared with baseline in the PRP group (320.8 ± 57.7 at baseline to 297 ± 66.3 m at 10 months, P 0.01). Subfoveal CT was not significantly different between the 2 groups at 10 months. The best-corrected visual acuity did not change after treatment in the two groups, and there was no correlation between BCVA and CT changes (r 0.222, P 0.37 in the PRP group and r 0.387, P 0.12 in the PRP + IVB group). Significant increases in RT were seen in the PRP + IVB group at 6 months and in the PRP group at Months 1, 3, 6, and 10. A correlation between changes in CT and RT was only seen in the PRP group at 10 months after treatment. Conclusion: Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy treated with PRP + IVB and PRP both had significant reduction in CT at 10 months; however, the eyes that were also treated with IVB also underwent an earlier but transient reduction at 3 months. Patients treated with IVB underwent less increase in RT.