Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Carcinogenic and Non-Carcinogenic Risk Assessments of Arsenic Contamination in Drinking Water of Ardabil City in the Northwest of Iran Publisher Pubmed



Sadeghi F1 ; Nasseri S1, 2 ; Yunesian M2, 3 ; Nabizadeh R2, 3 ; Mosaferi M4 ; Mesdaghinia A1, 2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Center for Water Quality Research (CWQR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Center for Air Pollution Research (CAPR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Source: Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering Published:2018


Abstract

Based on the environmental health assessment framework of the United State Environmental Protection Agency, a quantitative health risk assessment of arsenic in contaminated drinking water in a city in the northwest of Iran has been carried out. In the exposure assessment step, arsenic concentrations in drinking water were determined during four seasons. In addition, the water ingestion rate for different age groups in this region was determined. The concentration of arsenic in 163 collected samples from different locations during four seasons ranged from 0 to 99 μg L−1. Furthermore, a high percentage of the samples manifested higher levels than the permissible limit of 10 μg L−1. The total daily water intake rates of four age groups 1 to <2 (group 1), 2 to <6 (group 2), 6 to <16 (group 3), and ≥16 years (group 4) were estimated as 0.86, 1.49, 2.00, and 2.33 L day−1, respectively. Calculating the lifetime average daily dose of arsenic indicated that adults (group 4) had the highest and children (group 1) had the lowest daily intake of arsenic in their entire life. The results of risk characteristic showed that the order of excess lifetime cancer risk via arsenic exposure in the four groups was 4 > 3 > 2 > 1. The estimated risks for all age groups were higher than the acceptable range (1E−6 to 1E−4). The hazard quotient values for all of the classified groups were lower than the recommended limit values (<1), but it cannot be concluded that potential non-carcinogenicity risks are non-existent since the possible exposure to arsenic via food and skin may also pose the risk. © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.