Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Accuracy of Early Rapid Ultrasound in Shock (Rush) Examination Performed by Emergency Physician for Diagnosis of Shock Etiology in Critically Ill Patients Publisher



Ghane MR1 ; Gharib M2 ; Ebrahimi A3 ; Saeedi M4 ; Akbarikamrani M5 ; Rezaee M6 ; Rasouli H6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiology, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Surgery, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Researcher, Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Emergencies# Trauma and Shock Published:2015


Abstract

Background: Rapid Ultrasound in Shock (RUSH) is a recently reported emergency ultrasound protocol designed to help clinicians better recognize distinctive shock etiologies in a short time. We tried to evaluate the accuracy of early RUSH protocol performed by emergency physicians to predict the shock type in critically ill patients. Materials and Methods: Our prospective study was approved by the ethics committee of trauma research center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Science, Iran. We enrolled 52 patients with shock state in the emergency department from April 2013 to October 2013. We performed early bed-side sonographic examination for participants based on RUSH protocol. Patients received all needed standard therapeutic and diagnostic interventions without delay and were followed to document their final diagnosis. Agreement (Kappa index) of initial impression provided by RUSH with final diagnosis, and also sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RUSH for diagnosis of each shock type were calculated. Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled in our study. Kappa index was 0.7 (P value = 0.000), reflecting acceptable general agreement between initial impression and final diagnosis. For hypovolemic and obstructive shocks, the protocol had sensitivity of 100% but had lower PPV. For shocks with distributive or mixed etiology, RUSH showed PPV of 100% but had low sensitivity. For cardiogenic shocks, all reliability indices were above 90%. Conclusion: We highlight the role of RUSH examination in the hands of an emergency physician in making a rapid diagnosis of shock etiology, especially in ruling out obstructive, cardiogenic, and hypovolemic types.