Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Utility of Pax8 in Comparison With Pax5 Immunohistochemical Staining in the Diagnosis of Hodgkin Lymphoma Publisher Pubmed



Ameli F1 ; Zahavi Z1 ; Kosari F2 ; Soleimani V1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 1419733141, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Pathology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 1411713135, Tehran, Iran

Source: Annals of Diagnostic Pathology Published:2022


Abstract

Background: Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is among the most prevalent lymphomas worldwide. PAX5 has a great value in separating this entity from other T cell lymphoma; however, it is weakly expressed in neoplastic cells. Polyclonal PAX8 was positive in a variety of lymphoid neoplasms in several previous studies and the staining paralleled that of PAX5 but monoclonal PAX8 was negative in the same neoplasms. The aim of this study was to compare immunohistochemical patterns of monoclonal PAX8 with PAX5 in Classical and NLPHL samples. Material and methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 89 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded blocks from HL patients (69 Classical and 20 NLPHL) admitted to Imam Khomeini and Dr. Shariati hospitals, Tehran, Iran during 2016–2020. Diagnoses were confirmed by reviewing previous immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies, including PAX5. All samples were stained for PAX8 (clone MRQ-50). Expression intensity scoring was made for both antibodies in neoplastic and background cells based on nuclear staining percentage. Results: PAX8 was positive in neoplastic and background B lymphocytes of all classical and NLPHL samples. PAX8 Expression intensity was significantly higher in neoplastic and background cells compared to PAX5 in classical HL samples (P = 0.001). PAX5 expression intensity in neoplastic cells was significantly higher in NLPHL samples compared to classical HL (P = 0.040); however, no significant difference in PAX8 expression between neoplastic cells of NLPHL and HL was seen. PAX8 expression intensity was not significantly correlated with gender, histologic subtype, tumor location, and relapse. Conclusions: PAX8 monoclonal antibody (clone MRQ-50) showed strong nuclear reactivity in neoplastic and background cells of classical HL and NLPHL samples. Therefore, this marker can be utilized as a valuable alternative for PAX5 in differentiating HL from other T cell lymphoma in challenging cases. © 2022