Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Efficacy and Challenges: Minimally Invasive Procedures for Trigeminal Neuralgia Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis - a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher



Sohrabiasl M1 ; Shirani M2, 4 ; Jahanbakhshi A3 ; Iranmehr A2, 4, 5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Neurosurgery Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Gamma-Knife Center, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

Source: Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery Published:2024


Abstract

Introduction: Trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) poses a therapeutic challenge, particularly within the context of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of four less-invasive treatment modalities for TGN in MS patients, namely, gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS), glycerol rhizotomy (GR), balloon compression (BC), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Methods: Single-armed meta-analyses were employed to assess the overall efficacy of each treatment, while double-armed analyses compared the efficacy between different treatment options in double-armed studies. Outcome evaluations included acute pain relief (within 1 month post-procedure), recurrence rates throughout 18 months of follow-up, and reported complication rates. Results: The meta-analysis revealed diverse outcomes for each intervention. GKRS demonstrated favorable outcomes, achieving a 77% success rate in alleviating pain among a pooled cohort of 863 patients, reinforcing its status as a viable therapeutic option. Additionally, GR, BC, and RFA exhibited efficacy, with success rates of 77%, 71%, and 80%, respectively, based on outcomes observed in 611, 385, and 203 patients. Double-armed analyses highlighted distinctions between the treatments, providing nuanced insights for clinical decision-making. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview of less-invasive treatments for TGN in MS patients. GKRS emerges as a leading option with comparable efficacy and fewer complications. However, the study underscores the nuanced efficacy and considerations associated with GR, BC, and RFA. The findings offer valuable insights for clinicians navigating treatment choices in this challenging patient population, considering acute pain relief, recurrence rates, and complication profiles. © 2024 S. Karger AG. All rights reserved.