Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Artificial Intelligence, Bi-Rads Evaluation and Morphometry: A Novel Combination to Diagnose Breast Cancer Using Ultrasonography, Results From Multi-Center Cohorts Publisher Pubmed



Hamyoon H1 ; Yee Chan W14 ; Mohammadi A3 ; Yusuf Kuzan T4 ; Mirzaaghazadehattari M5 ; Leong WL2 ; Murzoglu Altintoprak K4 ; Vijayananthan A2 ; Rahmat K2 ; Ab Mumin N2, 6 ; Sam Leong S7 ; Ejtehadifar S3 ; Faeghi F8 ; Abolghasemi J9 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Hamyoon H1
  2. Yee Chan W14
  3. Mohammadi A3
  4. Yusuf Kuzan T4
  5. Mirzaaghazadehattari M5
  6. Leong WL2
  7. Murzoglu Altintoprak K4
  8. Vijayananthan A2
  9. Rahmat K2
  10. Ab Mumin N2, 6
  11. Sam Leong S7
  12. Ejtehadifar S3
  13. Faeghi F8
  14. Abolghasemi J9
  15. Ciaccio EJ10
  16. Rajendra Acharya U11, 12, 13
  17. Abbasian Ardakani A8
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Biomedical Imaging, Universiti Malaya Research Imaging Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Malaysia
  3. 3. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Science, Urmia, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Radiology, Sancaktepe Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  5. 5. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
  6. 6. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 47000 Selangor, Malaysia
  7. 7. Centre of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, Selangor, Bandar Puncak Alam, 42300, Malaysia
  8. 8. Department of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  9. 9. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  10. 10. Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, 10032, NY, United States
  11. 11. Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Singapore, 599489, Singapore
  12. 12. Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Science and Technology, SUSS University, Singapore
  13. 13. Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
  14. 14. Gleneagles Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Imaging Department, Jalan Ampang, Kampung Berembang, Kuala Lumpur, 50450, Malaysia

Source: European Journal of Radiology Published:2022


Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for the classification of breast lesions on ultrasound images. Method: In the present study, three separate data cohorts containing 1288 breast lesions from three countries (Malaysia, Iran, and Turkey) were utilized for MLmodel development and external validation. The model was trained on ultrasound images of 725 breast lesions, and validation was done separately on the remaining data. An expert radiologist and a radiology resident classified the lesions based on the BI-RADS lexicon. Thirteen morphometric features were selected from a contour of the lesion and underwent a three-step feature selection process. Five features were chosen to be fed into the model separately and combined with the imaging signs mentioned in the BI-RADS reference guide. A support vector classifier was trained and optimized. Results: The diagnostic profile of the model with various input data was compared to the expert radiologist and radiology resident. The agreement of each approach with histopathologic specimens was also determined. Based on BI-RADS and morphometric features, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.885, which is higher than the expert radiologist and radiology resident performances with AUC of 0.814 and 0.632, respectively in all cohorts. DeLong's test also showed that the AUC of the ML protocol was significantly different from that of the expert radiologist (ΔAUCs = 0.071, 95%CI: (0.056, 0.086), P = 0.005). Conclusions: These results support the possible role of morphometric features in enhancing the already well-excepted classification schemes. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)