Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Muscular Fatigue on the Cumulative Lumbar Damage During Repetitive Lifting Task: A Comparative Study of Damage Calculation Methods Publisher Pubmed



Kazemi Z1 ; Arjmand N2 ; Mazloumi A3, 4 ; Karimi Z5 ; Keihani A6 ; Ghasemi MS7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States
  2. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Ergonomics, School of Public Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Ergonomics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Ergonomics Published:2024


Abstract

Several methods have been put forward to quantify cumulative loads; however, limited evidence exists as to the subsequent damages and the role of muscular fatigue. The present study assessed whether muscular fatigue could affect cumulative damage imposed on the L5–S1 joint. Trunk muscle electromyographic (EMG) activities and kinematics/kinetics of 18 healthy male individuals were evaluated during a simulated repetitive lifting task. A traditional EMG-assisted model of the lumbar spine was modified to account for the effect of erector spinae fatigue. L5–S1 compressive loads for each lifting cycle were estimated based on varying (i.e. actual), fatigue-modified, and constant Gain factors. The corresponding damages were integrated to calculate the cumulative damage. Moreover, the damage calculated for one lifting cycle was multiplied by the lifting frequency, as the traditional approach. Compressive loads and the damages obtained through the fatigue-modified model were predicted in close agreement with the actual values. Similarly, the difference between actual damages and those driven by the traditional approach was not statistically significant (p = 0.219). However, damages based on a constant Gain factor were significantly greater than those based on the actual (p = 0.012), fatigue-modified (p = 0.017), and traditional (p = 0.007) approaches. Practitioner summary: In this study, we managed to include the effect of muscular fatigue on cumulative lumbar damage calculations. Including the effect of muscular fatigue leads to an accurate estimation of cumulative damages while eliminating computational complexity. However, using the traditional approach also appears to provide acceptable estimates for ergonomic assessments. © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.