Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Early Versus Late Physiotherapy Following Arthroscopic Repair of Small and Medium Size Rotator Cuff Tear: A Randomized Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Guity MR1 ; Mirghaderi P1, 2 ; Mortazavi SJ1 ; Malek M3 ; Moharrami A1 ; Bagheri N4 ; Sharifpour S1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Surgical Research Society (SRS), Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Radiology Department, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex (IKHC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Shoulder and Elbow Fellowship, Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Orthopaedics Published:2023


Abstract

Purpose: We compared early and late physiotherapy for patients with small and medium size rotator cuff tears following arthroscopic repair. Methods: A single-centre, single-blinded, prospective parallel RCT was performed with two arms: early physiotherapy (start within the first week) versus late physiotherapy (start 4 weeks after surgery). Patients with small- to medium-sized isolated full-thickness superior rotator cuff tears were included and followed for 12 months. The primary outcome measures were shoulder function and range of motion (ROM) measured by the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at three months, six months, and 12 months. The other outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) pain and the rotator cuff ultrasound (US) evaluation by the Sugaya classification. Results: In three and six month follow-ups, CMS was significantly superior in the intervention group compared to controls (P < 0.05). However, only at the three month follow-up between-group difference met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (MCID = 10.4) (59.8 vs. 48.9). The intervention group experienced less pain than controls in the first six months (P < 0.001), and only the three month follow-up was clinically meaningful based on MCID (MCID = 1.4). Moreover, in the first six months, the shoulder ROM favoured the intervention group (P < 0.05). US grading of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus was similar between groups (P = 0.07). One retear occurred in the intervention group and another in the controls, detected by examination and US evaluation. Conclusion: Following the arthroscopic repair of a small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tear, early physiotherapy showed promising results for pain, function, and range of motion. Level of evidence: Level I therapeutic. © 2023, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.