Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Impact of Government Subsidy Programs on Equity in Health Financing Publisher



Mohammadzadeh Y1 ; Sheikhmali A1 ; Yahyavi Dizaj J2 ; Mosadeghrad AM3 ; Yusefzadeh H4 ; Refah Kahriz A1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Health Management & Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Management and health economics, Faculty of Health, University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Source: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Published:2023


Abstract

Background: Iran government implemented the targeted subsidy plan in December 2010 to reduce energy consumption and inequality. In addition, the Health Transformation Plan was implemented by the Ministry of Health to reduce out-of-pocket payments. This study aimed to examine the impact of these two government subsidy programs on equity in health financing. Method: In this study, data on 528,046 households were collected using household surveys during 14 years (2007–2020). The Fairness in Financial Contribution index and Catastrophic Health Expenditures index were calculated. Also, a Logistic regression model was performed by the applied software of Stata V.14 to examine the effects of the two mentioned policies and other socioeconomic characteristics of households on their exposure to Catastrophic Health Expenditures. Results: The FFC index was 0.829 and 0.795 respectively in 2007 and 2020. The trend analysis did not show significant changes in the FFC index between 2007 and 2020. TSP and HTP implementations do not reduce households’ exposure to CHE significantly. Crowded households with more elder people, belonging to low-income deciles, without houses, and living in rural areas and deprived provinces, are more likely to be at risk of CHE. Health insurance coverage did not protect households from CHE. Highly educated and employed households were exposed to less CHE. Conclusion: The government subsidy programs have not been effective in improving FFC and reducing CHE indices. None of them has been able to realize the goal of the 6th National Development Plan of reducing CHE to 1%. The government should devise support packages for target households (households with more elderly people, lower incomes, without private houses, crowded, rural, and inhabited in deprived provinces), so they can protect households against CHE. Modifying and improving the quality of insurance coverage is strongly recommended due to its inefficiency. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Other Related Docs
14. The Effect of Catastrophic Health Expenditure on Work After Retirement, International Journal of Aging and Human Development (2017)
17. Best Practices in Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review, Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2021)
23. Studying the Impoverishing Effects of Procuring Medicines: A National Study, BMC International Health and Human Rights (2019)
24. Inequality in Private Health Care Expenditures: A 36-Year Trend Study of Iranian Households, Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (2022)