Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
How to Formulate Research Questions and Design Studies for Telehealth Assessment and Evaluation Publisher Pubmed



Fatehi F1, 2, 3 ; Smith AC1 ; Maeder A4 ; Wade V5 ; Gray LC1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  2. 2. Australian eHealth Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Australia
  3. 3. School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  5. 5. Discipline of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Source: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Published:2017


Abstract

Planning a research strategy and formulating the right research questions at various stages of developing a telehealth intervention are essential for producing scientific evidence. The aim of research at each stage should correspond to the maturity of the intervention and will require a variety of study designs. Although there are several published evaluation frameworks for telemedicine or telehealth as a subset of broader eHealth domain, there is currently no simple model to guide research planning. In this paper we propose a five-stage model as a framework for planning a comprehensive telehealth research program for a new intervention or service system. The stages are: (1) Concept development, (2) Service design, (3) Pre-implementation, (4) Implementation, (5) Post-implementation, and at each stage a number of studies are considered. Robust evaluation is important for the widespread acceptance and implementation of telehealth. We hope this framework enables researchers, service administrators and clinicians to conceptualise, undertake and appraise telehealth research from the point of view of being able to assess how applicable and valid the research is for their particular circumstances. © 2016, © The Author(s) 2016.
Related Docs