Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Diagnostic Value of Lacrimal Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Lacrimal Drainage System Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Mirshahvalad SA1 ; Chavoshi M2 ; Bahmani Kashkouli M3 ; Fallahi B1 ; Emamiardakani A1 ; Manafifarid R1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Dr. Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiology, Dr. Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  3. 3. Skull Base and Eye Research Center, The Five Senses Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Nuclear Medicine Communications Published:2022


Abstract

Purpose A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of lacrimal scintigraphy (LS) versus anatomical methods in the evaluation of the nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Materials and methods A systematic search was performed using electronic bibliographic databases until the end of May 2021. Inclusion criteria: (a) used LS as a diagnostic method to evaluate NLDO; (b) used anatomical studies [including syringing, irrigation, probing, and dacryocystography (DCG)] as reference tests; and (c) provided adequate crude data. A hierarchical method was used to pool the sensitivity and specificity. The hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic model was performed. Additionally, the studies' heterogeneity and publication bias were analyzed. All analyses were conducted by the 'Midas' module of STATA 16. Results Twelve articles (with 14 separate populations) were considered eligible to enter the meta-analysis. They were divided into two groups based on the reference standard method, called irrigation and DCG groups. In the irrigation group, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72-96%] and 25% (95% CI, 8-56%), respectively. In DCG group, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 97% (95% CI, 85-100%) and 27% (95% CI, 0.12-0.49), in turn. Conclusion LS is a sensitive modality to evaluate the anatomical obstruction of NLD. In contrast, it shows low pooled specificity compared with anatomical methods. Thus, LS can be used as the first noninvasive modality for the evaluation of epiphora. However, in case of any abnormality, confirmatory procedures are required. © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Related Docs
Experts (# of related papers)