Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Fixed-Dose Combination Therapies With and Without Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Joseph P1 ; Roshandel G2, 3 ; Gao P1 ; Pais P4 ; Lonn E1 ; Xavier D4, 5 ; Avezum A6 ; Zhu J7 ; Liu L7 ; Sliwa K8 ; Gamra H9 ; Bangdiwala SI1 ; Teo K1 ; Diaz R10 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Joseph P1
  2. Roshandel G2, 3
  3. Gao P1
  4. Pais P4
  5. Lonn E1
  6. Xavier D4, 5
  7. Avezum A6
  8. Zhu J7
  9. Liu L7
  10. Sliwa K8
  11. Gamra H9
  12. Bangdiwala SI1
  13. Teo K1
  14. Diaz R10
  15. Dans A11
  16. Lopezjaramillo P12
  17. Prabhakaran D13
  18. Castellano JM14, 15
  19. Fuster V16
  20. Rodgers A17
  21. Huffman MD17, 18
  22. Bosch J1
  23. Dagenais GR19
  24. Malekzadeh R20
  25. Yusuf S1
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  2. 2. Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
  3. 3. Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. St John's Research Institute, Bangalore, India
  5. 5. St John's Medical College, Bangalore, India
  6. 6. International Research Center, Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  7. 7. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
  8. 8. Cape Heart Institute, Department of Medicine and Cardiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  9. 9. Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital and University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
  10. 10. Estudios Clinicos Latino America, Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario, Rosario, Argentina
  11. 11. University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
  12. 12. Universidad de Santander, Instituto Masira, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Bucaramanga, Colombia
  13. 13. Public Health Foundation of India, Haryana, India
  14. 14. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  15. 15. Centro Integral de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Hospital Universitario Monteprincipe, Grupo HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
  16. 16. Zena and Michael A Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
  17. 17. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  18. 18. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
  19. 19. Universite Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec, Quebec, QC, Canada
  20. 20. Digestive Disease Research Institute, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: The Lancet Published:2021


Abstract

Background: In randomised controlled trials, fixed-dose combination treatments (or polypills) have been shown to reduce a composite of cardiovascular disease outcomes in primary prevention. However, whether or not aspirin should be included, effects on specific outcomes, and effects in key subgroups are unknown. Methods: We did an individual participant data meta-analysis of large randomised controlled trials (each with ≥1000 participants and ≥2 years of follow-up) of a fixed-dose combination treatment strategy versus control in a primary cardiovascular disease prevention population. We included trials that evaluated a fixed-dose combination strategy of at least two blood pressure lowering agents plus a statin (with or without aspirin), compared with a control strategy (either placebo or usual care). The primary outcome was time to first occurrence of a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or arterial revascularisation. Additional outcomes included individual cardiovascular outcomes and death from any cause. Outcomes were also evaluated in groups stratified by the inclusion of aspirin in the fixed-dose treatment strategy, and effect sizes were estimated in prespecified subgroups based on risk factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare strategies. Findings: Three large randomised trials were included in the analysis (TIPS-3, HOPE-3, and PolyIran), with a total of 18 162 participants. Mean age was 63·0 years (SD 7·1), and 9038 (49·8%) participants were female. Estimated 10-year cardiovascular disease risk for the population was 17·7% (8·7). During a median follow-up of 5 years, the primary outcome occurred in 276 (3·0%) participants in the fixed-dose combination strategy group compared with 445 (4·9%) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·62, 95% CI 0·53–0·73, p<0·0001). Reductions were also observed for the separate components of the primary outcome: myocardial infarction (0·52, 0·38–0·70), revascularisation (0·54, 0·36–0·80), stroke (0·59, 0·45–0·78), and cardiovascular death (0·65, 0·52–0·81). Significant reductions in the primary outcome and its components were observed in the analyses of fixed-dose combination strategies with and without aspirin, with greater reductions for strategies including aspirin. Treatment effects were similar at different lipid and blood pressure levels, and in the presence or absence of diabetes, smoking, or obesity. Gastrointestinal bleeding was uncommon but slightly more frequent in the fixed-dose combination strategy with aspirin group versus control (19 [0·4%] vs 11 [0·2%], p=0·15). The frequencies of haemorrhagic stroke (10 [0·2%] vs 15 [0·3%]), fatal bleeding (two [<0·1%] vs four [0·1%]), and peptic ulcer disease (32 [0·7%] vs 34 [0·8%]) were low and did not differ significantly between groups. Dizziness was more common with fixed-dose combination treatment (1060 [11·7%] vs 834 [9·2%], p<0·0001). Interpretation: Fixed-dose combination treatment strategies substantially reduce cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularisation, and cardiovascular death in primary cardiovascular disease prevention. These benefits are consistent irrespective of cardiometabolic risk factors. Funding: Population Health Research Institute. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs