Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues

Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues Publisher Pubmed

Sabour S^{1, 2} ; Ghassemi F³

Show Affiliations

1. Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3. Department of Retina & Ocular Oncology, School of Medicine, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Published:2016

Abstract

[No abstract available]

2. Letter to the Editor [5], Retina (2016)

3. Comments on “Reproducibility of Digital Measurements of Lower-Limb Deformity on Plain Radiographs and Agreement With Ct Measurements” by Sorin G, Pasquier G, Drumez E, Arnould A, Migaud H, Putman S Published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016;102:423–28. Common Mistake and Methodological Issue to Avoid Mismanagement, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research (2016)

4. Comments on “Reproducibility of Digital Measurements of Lower-Limb Deformity on Plain Radiographs and Agreement With Ct Measurements” by G. Sorin, G. Pasquier, E. Drumez, A. Arnould, H. Migaud, S. Putman Published in Orthop & Traumat: Surgery & Research 2016,102: 423–28. Common Mistake and Methodological Issue to Avoid Mismanagement, Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Traumatologique (2016)

5. Choroidal Thickness Measurements in Subjects on 3 Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Machines: Common Mistake in Reproducibility Analysis, International Ophthalmology (2018)

6. Comments on “New Insights Into Glioma Frequency Maps: From Genetic and Transcriptomic Correlate to Survival Prediction”, International Journal of Cancer (2023)

7. The Validity and Reliability of a Signal Impact Assessment Tool: Statistical Issue to Avoid Misinterpretation, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (2016)

Experts (# of related papers)

Fariba Ghassemi (7)

Style	Citing Format
MLA	Sabour S, Ghassemi F. "Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues." Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 254, no. 10, 2016, pp. 2073-2074.
APA	Sabour S, Ghassemi F (2016). Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 254(10), 2073-2074.
Chicago	Sabour S, Ghassemi F. "Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues." Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 254, no. 10 (2016): 2073-2074.
Harvard	Sabour S, Ghassemi F (2016) 'Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues', Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 254(10), pp. 2073-2074.
Vancouver	Sabour S, Ghassemi F. Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2016;254(10):2073-2074.
BibTex	@article{ author = {Sabour S and Ghassemi F}, title = {Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues}, journal = {Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology}, volume = {254}, number = {10}, pages = {2073-2074}, year = {2016} }
RIS	TY - JOUR AU - Sabour S AU - Ghassemi F TI - Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Etdrs Visual Acuity Chart: Methodological Issues JO - Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology VL - 254 IS - 10 SP - 2073 EP - 2074 PY - 2016 ER -

Science Communicator Platform

Authors

Authors Affiliations

Abstract