Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! By
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography for Detection of Intussusception in Children; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher



Rahmani E1 ; Amanibeni R2 ; Hekmatnia Y3 ; Yaseri AF4 ; Ahadiat SA5 ; Boroujeni PT6 ; Kiani M7 ; Tavakoli R2 ; Shafagh SG8 ; Shirazinia M9 ; Garousi S9 ; Arzaghi M10 ; Benam SP11 ; Rigi A12 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Rahmani E1
  2. Amanibeni R2
  3. Hekmatnia Y3
  4. Yaseri AF4
  5. Ahadiat SA5
  6. Boroujeni PT6
  7. Kiani M7
  8. Tavakoli R2
  9. Shafagh SG8
  10. Shirazinia M9
  11. Garousi S9
  12. Arzaghi M10
  13. Benam SP11
  14. Rigi A12
  15. Salmani A13
  16. Abdollahi Z14
  17. Rokni FK15
  18. Nikbakht T16
  19. Abadi SAH15
  20. Roohinezhad R8
  21. Haririan Y18
  22. Darouei B2
  23. Fayyazishishavan E19
  24. Farrokhi M22

Source: Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine Published:2023


Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of intussusception can be challenging in children due to the fact that the findings of clinical evaluations are nonspecific and most of the patients present with unclear history. Therefore, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for detection of intussusception and also compare the efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) with radiologist-performed ultrasound (RADUS). Methods: Two independent reviewers systematically searched different online electronic databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane from inception to December 1, 2022 to identify published papers reporting accuracy of ultrasonography for diagnosis of intussusception. The quality assessment of the included studies was investigated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. Results: A total of 1446 records were retrieved in the initial search of databases. After screening the titles, a total of 344 studies were retrieved for the detailed assessment of full-text. Finally, 37 studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography for diagnosis of intussusception were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.95-0.97) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.97-0.98), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 24.57 (95% CI: 8.26-73.03) and 0.05 (95% CI: 0.04-0.08), respectively. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) curve was 0.989. Mete-regression showed that there is no significant difference between diagnostic performance of POCUS and RADUS (p = 0.06 and rDOR (diagnostic odds ratio) = 4.38 (95% CI: 0.92-20.89)). Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows that ultrasonography has excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of intussusception in pediatric patients. Moreover, we found that diagnostic performance of POCUS is similar to that of RADUS for diagnosis of intussusception. © 2023, Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. All Rights Reserved.