Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter Inhibitors and Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Publisher Pubmed



Pandey AK1 ; Okaj I1 ; Kaur H2 ; Belleycote EP3, 4, 6 ; Wang J6 ; Oraii A7 ; Benz AP6 ; Johnson LSB8 ; Young J2 ; Wong JA5, 6 ; Verma S9 ; Conen D2, 3, 6 ; Gerstein H2, 3, 6 ; Healey JS4 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Pandey AK1
  2. Okaj I1
  3. Kaur H2
  4. Belleycote EP3, 4, 6
  5. Wang J6
  6. Oraii A7
  7. Benz AP6
  8. Johnson LSB8
  9. Young J2
  10. Wong JA5, 6
  11. Verma S9
  12. Conen D2, 3, 6
  13. Gerstein H2, 3, 6
  14. Healey JS4
  15. Mcintyre WF1, 3, 4, 6
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  2. 2. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  3. 3. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  4. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  5. 5. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  6. 6. Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  7. 7. Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  9. 9. Division of Cardiac Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Source: Journal of the American Heart Association Published:2021


Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) inhibitors reduce cardiovascular outcomes including mortality in several populations; however, their effect on atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) remains unclear. Our objective was to determine whether SGLT inhibitors reduce AF and whether a history of AF modifies the effect of SGLT inhibitors on the composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to March 2021. Pairs of reviewers identified randomized controlled trials that compared an SGLT inhibitor with placebo or no therapy. We pooled data using RevMan 5.4.1, assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool, and determined the overall quality of evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Thirty-one eligible trials reported on AF events (75 279 participants, mean age 62 years, 35.0% women). Moderate quality evidence supported a lower risk of serious AF events with SGLT inhibitors (1.1% versus 1.5%; risk ratio 0.75 [95% CI, 0.66–0.86]; I2=0%). A similar reduction in total AF events was also noted with SGLT inhibitors. Three trials reported on heart failure hospitalization/cardiovascular death stratified by a baseline history of AF (18 832 participants, mean age 66 years, 38.1% women); in patients with a history of AF, SGLT inhibitors resulted in a lower risk in the composite of heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57–0.85]; I2=0%)—similar to the effect estimate for patients without AF, P value for interaction: 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: SGLT inhibitors may reduce AF events and likely reduce heart failure hospitalization/cardiovascular death to a similar extent in patients with and without AF. © 2021 The Authors.