Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Critical Review on the Experimental Setups Used to Assess the Efficiency of Respirators Against Ambient Particulate Matter Publisher



Faridi S1, 2 ; Yousefian F3 ; Niazi S4 ; Ghalhari MR2 ; Rafiee A5 ; Harrison RM6, 7 ; Brook RD8 ; Contini D9 ; Kumar P10 ; Naddafi K1, 2 ; Hassanvand MS1, 2 ; Carlsten C11
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Center for Air Pollution Research (CAPR), Institute for Environmental Research (IER), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 1547, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 1547, Iran
  3. 3. Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, 30322, GA, United States
  4. 4. School of Science, Western Sydney University, Penrith, 2751, NSW, Australia
  5. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2S2, AB, Canada
  6. 6. School of Geography Earth and Environmental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
  7. 7. Department of Environmental Sciences, Center of Excellence in Environmental Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah P.O. Box 80203, Saudi Arabia
  8. 8. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, 6135 Woodward Ave., Detroit, 48202, MI, United States
  9. 9. Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate—ISAC-CNR, Lecce, 73100, Italy
  10. 10. Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
  11. 11. Air Pollution Exposure Laboratory, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, BC, Canada

Source: Atmosphere Published:2024


Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) poses significant health risks, prompting public health organizations to recommend the use of respirators and facemasks (RFMs) to mitigate exposure. Consequently, interest in their usage has increased, leading to several studies assessing the efficiency of these personal-level interventions against various fractions of ambient particulate matter (PM). We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify relevant studies and address the following objectives: (1) explore the efficiency of RFMs in reducing ambient PM; (2) discuss discrepancies in efficiencies reported; (3) critique the experimental setups used to evaluate the efficiency of RFMs; and (4) propose recommendations for future research. Five relevant studies we reviewed reported significantly lower RFM effectiveness against ambient PM, with a size-dependent efficiency that decreases for smaller PM fractions. Variations in the reported efficiencies were primarily attributed to design-related factors, resulting in poor facial fit. Therefore, it is crucial to consider standardizing and properly designing these products. These studies overlooked essential factors, such as using dummy heads with flexible textures that mimic human skin. The use of rigid-textured dummy heads, as seen in previous studies, may fail to accurately represent real-world conditions. We recommend researchers take into account diverse facial profiles in their experiments. Moreover, it is essential to consider facial characteristics in the design of RFMs. We believe the evidence supports the increasing need for the adoption of appropriate guidelines and regulations to govern RFM suppliers at both national and international levels. © 2024 by the authors.
Experts (# of related papers)