Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Survival Factors in 1580 Adults With Spinal Ependymoma: Insights From a Multicenter Oncology Database Publisher Pubmed



Almistarehi AH1 ; Parker M1 ; Xia Y1 ; Hasanzadeh A2 ; Horowitz MA1 ; Raj D1 ; Papali P1 ; Davidar AD1 ; Redmond KJ3 ; Bettegowda C1 ; Witham T1 ; Bydon A1 ; Theodore N1 ; Lubelski D1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
  2. 2. Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center, Medical School, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Radiation and Molecular Oncology, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

Source: World Neurosurgery Published:2024


Abstract

Background: Using a multi-institutional oncology database, we investigate the survival rates and the impacts of demographic, clinical, and management characteristics on overall survival among adult patients diagnosed with spinal ependymoma. Methods: Utilizing the SEER registry, patients with histologically or radiologically confirmed ependymomas were included. Factors impacting overall survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank statistical analyses. Results: A total of 1,580 patients were included. Their mean ± standard deviation age was 46.68 ± 15.96 years, and 51.1% were women. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 66.4% of patients. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 96.7% and 95.4%, respectively. A multivariable backward Cox regression showed that age ≥65 years was a significant predictor for mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.21–7.00; P < 0.001). Likewise, tumor grade 3 (HR: 6.36; 95% CI: 1.95–20.76; P = 0.002), tumor grade 4 (HR: 7.74; 95% CI: 3.97–15.11; P < 0.001), presence of extra-neural metastasis (HR: 13.81; 95% CI: 3.67–51.96; P < 0.001), and receiving radiotherapy (HR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.50–4.19; P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for mortality, while GTR was significantly associated with improved overall survival compared with subtotal resection or nonsurgical management (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.25–0.73; P = 0.002). There were no significant effects for gender, race, marital status, income, residential area, chemotherapy, tumor size, and the presence of other benign or malignant tumors on the survival hazards (P > 0.05 for each). Conclusion: Early diagnosis and surgical management of spinal ependymomas, such as GTR, were associated with remarkable survival benefits. Old age, high-grade spinal ependymoma, and extra-neural metastasis were associated with worse overall survival, whereas radiotherapy's role remains unclear. © 2024 Elsevier Inc.