Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Metamotivation in Medical Education: The 4F Conceptual Framework Publisher



Norouzi A1 ; Parmelee D2 ; Norouzi S3 ; Alizadeh M4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Education Development Center (EDC) and Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
  2. 2. Medical Education, Psychiatry and Pediatrics, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States
  3. 3. Abhar Nursing School, and Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Zanjan University of Medical Science, Zanjan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine and Health Professions Education Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

Source: Medical Teacher Published:2024


Abstract

Introduction: Several models and frameworks have been developed in the past two decades to explain motivation regulation in different fields. However, a comprehensive framework that explains the dimensions of metamotivation in medical education is lacking. This study aims to address this gap by presenting a conceptual framework to understand metamotivation in medical education. Method: This study was conducted at Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2022–2023. We applied Crawford’s guidance on developing a conceptual framework via collecting data from three sources: experience, literature, and theory. We developed the initial draft of the conceptual framework by identifying gaps in existing models. A panel of experts reviewed the draft and provided feedback on the framework’s generation, explanation, and argumentation. The final model was designed in the form of a graphical presentation. Findings: The study’s conceptual framework clearly distinguishes between motivational challenges and motivational problems, and outlines four phases that explain each phase’s importance, components, and implementation process. The first phase focuses on promoting metamotivational knowledge among learners. In the second phase, learners face motivational challenges and aim to manage them optimally to prevent motivational problems. The third phase occurs when a motivational problem arises, and learners use motivational regulation strategies to resolve it. In the fourth and final phase, learners use psychological skills to stabilize and strengthen the metamotivational process. Conclusion: This study’s conceptual framework focuses specifically on the context of medical education to provide guidance for future research and interventions on metamotivation. By presenting this framework, we aim to capture the attention of researchers toward the topic of metamotivation and encourage further exploration of its dimensions. © 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.